Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the effectiveness of recent large vision-language models (LVLMs) in various specialized tasks
- Covers topics such as recognition via LVLMs, localization, and multi-modal understanding
- Also discusses hallucination in LVLMs and their application in medical report generation
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the performance of recent large vision-language models (LVLMs) – AI systems that can understand both images and text – in specialized tasks. These tasks include object recognition (identifying what's in an image), object localization (finding where things are in an image), and multi-modal understanding (comprehending the relationship between images and text).
The researchers also look at how these LVLMs can sometimes "hallucinate" – generate incorrect or nonsensical information – and how they can be applied to generate medical reports from visual data. The goal is to assess the current capabilities and limitations of these powerful AI models, which have shown impressive results in areas like image captioning and visual question answering.
By understanding where LVLMs excel and where they struggle, the research can help guide the development of more robust and reliable vision-language AI systems in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of recent large vision-language models (LVLMs) across a variety of specialized tasks. These tasks include object recognition, localization, and multi-modal understanding.
The researchers examine the performance of state-of-the-art LVLMs on benchmark datasets for these tasks, leveraging both quantitative metrics and qualitative analysis. They also investigate the issue of hallucination in LVLMs, where the models generate incorrect or nonsensical information, and explore the application of these models in medical report generation from visual data.
The findings provide valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of large vision-language models, informing the ongoing development of these powerful AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper offers a thorough and systematic assessment of recent LVLMs, highlighting both their strengths and weaknesses across a range of specialized tasks. However, the authors acknowledge that the field is rapidly evolving, and the performance of these models may continue to improve with further advancements in architecture and training.
One potential concern raised is the issue of hallucination, where LVLMs can generate incorrect or nonsensical information, particularly in open-ended tasks. The authors suggest that further research is needed to better understand and mitigate this challenge.
Additionally, while the application of LVLMs in medical report generation is promising, the authors note that these models may require domain-specific fine-tuning and careful oversight to ensure reliable and trustworthy performance in high-stakes medical scenarios.
Overall, the research provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the evaluation and practical deployment of large vision-language models, highlighting both their potential and the need for continued innovation and responsible development.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of recent large vision-language models (LVLMs) in specialized tasks, including object recognition, localization, and multi-modal understanding. The findings provide valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of these powerful AI systems, informing ongoing research and development efforts.
The researchers identify key strengths, such as impressive performance on benchmark datasets, as well as persistent challenges, such as the issue of hallucination. They also explore the application of LVLMs in medical report generation, highlighting both the promise and the need for careful domain-specific adaptation and oversight.
Overall, this work contributes to the growing body of research aimed at understanding and advancing the state-of-the-art in vision-language AI, with the ultimate goal of developing more robust, reliable, and beneficial systems for a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Models
Yao Jiang, Xinyu Yan, Ge-Peng Ji, Keren Fu, Meijun Sun, Huan Xiong, Deng-Ping Fan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan
The advent of large vision-language models (LVLMs) represents a remarkable advance in the quest for artificial general intelligence. However, the model's effectiveness in both specialized and general tasks warrants further investigation. This paper endeavors to evaluate the competency of popular LVLMs in specialized and general tasks, respectively, aiming to offer a comprehensive understanding of these novel models. To gauge their effectiveness in specialized tasks, we employ six challenging tasks in three different application scenarios: natural, healthcare, and industrial. These six tasks include salient/camouflaged/transparent object detection, as well as polyp detection, skin lesion detection, and industrial anomaly detection. We examine the performance of three recent open-source LVLMs, including MiniGPT-v2, LLaVA-1.5, and Shikra, on both visual recognition and localization in these tasks. Moreover, we conduct empirical investigations utilizing the aforementioned LVLMs together with GPT-4V, assessing their multi-modal understanding capabilities in general tasks including object counting, absurd question answering, affordance reasoning, attribute recognition, and spatial relation reasoning. Our investigations reveal that these LVLMs demonstrate limited proficiency not only in specialized tasks but also in general tasks. We delve deep into this inadequacy and uncover several potential factors, including limited cognition in specialized tasks, object hallucination, text-to-image interference, and decreased robustness in complex problems. We hope that this study can provide useful insights for the future development of LVLMs, helping researchers improve LVLMs for both general and specialized applications.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Beyond the Hype: A dispassionate look at vision-language models in medical scenario
Yang Nan, Huichi Zhou, Xiaodan Xing, Guang Yang
Recent advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, garnering significant attention in AI communities. However, their performance and reliability in specialized domains such as medicine remain insufficiently assessed. In particular, most assessments over-concentrate in evaluating VLMs based on simple Visual Question Answering (VQA) on multi-modality data, while ignoring the in-depth characteristic of LVLMs. In this study, we introduce RadVUQA, a novel Radiological Visual Understanding and Question Answering benchmark, to comprehensively evaluate existing LVLMs. RadVUQA mainly validates LVLMs across five dimensions: 1) Anatomical understanding, assessing the models' ability to visually identify biological structures; 2) Multimodal comprehension, which involves the capability of interpreting linguistic and visual instructions to produce desired outcomes; 3) Quantitative and spatial reasoning, evaluating the models' spatial awareness and proficiency in combining quantitative analysis with visual and linguistic information; 4) Physiological knowledge, measuring the models' capability to comprehend functions and mechanisms of organs and systems; and 5) Robustness, which assesses the models' capabilities against unharmonised and synthetic data. The results indicate that both generalized LVLMs and medical-specific LVLMs have critical deficiencies with weak multimodal comprehension and quantitative reasoning capabilities. Our findings reveal the large gap between existing LVLMs and clinicians, highlighting the urgent need for more robust and intelligent LVLMs. The code and dataset will be available after the acceptance of this paper.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Guiding Vision-Language Model Selection for Visual Question-Answering Across Tasks, Domains, and Knowledge Types
Neelabh Sinha, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha
Visual Question-Answering (VQA) has become a key use-case in several applications to aid user experience, particularly after Vision-Language Models (VLMs) achieving good results in zero-shot inference. But evaluating different VLMs for an application requirement using a standardized framework in practical settings is still challenging. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for evaluating VLMs tailored to VQA tasks in practical settings. We present a novel dataset derived from established VQA benchmarks, annotated with task types, application domains, and knowledge types, three key practical aspects on which tasks can vary. We also introduce GoEval, a multimodal evaluation metric developed using GPT-4o, achieving a correlation factor of 56.71% with human judgments. Our experiments with ten state-of-the-art VLMs reveals that no single model excelling universally, making appropriate selection a key design decision. Proprietary models such as Gemini-1.5-Pro and GPT-4o-mini generally outperform others, though open-source models like InternVL-2-8B and CogVLM-2-Llama-3-19B demonstrate competitive strengths in specific contexts, while providing additional advantages. This study guides the selection of VLMs based on specific task requirements and resource constraints, and can also be extended to other vision-language tasks.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding of Real-World Complexities Through Synthetic Benchmarks
Haokun Zhou, Yipeng Hong
This study assesses the ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated images. It introduces a new automated benchmark construction method for this evaluation. The experiment compared common LVLMs with human participants using a mixed dataset of AI and human-created images. Results showed that LVLMs could distinguish between the image types to some extent but exhibited a rightward bias, and perform significantly worse compared to humans. To build on these findings, we developed an automated benchmark construction process using AI. This process involved topic retrieval, narrative script generation, error embedding, and image generation, creating a diverse set of text-image pairs with intentional errors. We validated our method through constructing two caparable benchmarks. This study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LVLMs in real-world understanding and advances benchmark construction techniques, providing a scalable and automatic approach for AI model evaluation.
Read more6/14/2024