Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve incontext learning?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
 This paper explores whether learning the "right" latent variables necessarily leads to improved incontext learning.
 It examines the relationship between how a model learns to represent latent variables and its ability to learn in context.
 The paper compares implicit and explicit inference approaches to understand the factors that affect incontext learning performance.
Plain English Explanation
When training machine learning models, researchers often focus on getting the model to learn the "right" underlying factors or latent variables that represent the data. The idea is that if the model can learn these key latent variables, it will be better able to understand and generalize to new situations.
However, this paper questions whether simply learning the right latent variables is enough to guarantee good performance on incontext learning tasks. Incontext learning refers to a model's ability to quickly adapt and learn new concepts or skills based on a limited amount of contextual information.
The paper examines two different approaches to learning latent variables  implicit inference, where the model learns the variables indirectly, and explicit inference, where the model is explicitly trained to learn the variables. The researchers investigate whether one approach leads to better incontext learning abilities compared to the other.
By understanding the relationship between how latent variables are learned and incontext learning performance, the paper aims to provide insights into the factors that contribute to a model's ability to quickly adapt and learn in new situations. This could have important implications for developing more flexible and capable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the relationship between learning the "right" latent variables and incontext learning performance. It compares two approaches to learning latent variables:

Implicit Inference: The model learns the latent variables indirectly, without explicit supervision on the latent variables themselves. This is a common approach in many machine learning models.

Explicit Inference: The model is explicitly trained to learn the latent variables, often through auxiliary loss functions or architectural constraints.
The paper examines whether one of these approaches leads to better incontext learning abilities compared to the other. It presents theoretical analysis and empirical results to understand the factors that influence incontext learning performance.
The key insights from the technical analysis include:
 Link to "Towards Better Understanding the Context Learning Ability from"
 Link to "Asymptotic Theory of Context Learning by Linear Attention"
 Link to "MLPs Learn Context"
 Link to "How Does MultiTask Training Affect Transformer"
 Link to "Context Learning Through a Bayesian Prism"
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a nuanced analysis of the relationship between learning latent variables and incontext learning performance. While it challenges the assumption that learning the "right" latent variables is sufficient for good incontext learning, the authors acknowledge that there may still be value in explicit representation learning in certain scenarios.
One potential limitation of the research is the specific experimental setup and the choice of tasks used to evaluate incontext learning. The authors note that the results may depend on the complexity of the tasks and the amount of contextual information available. Further investigation with a broader range of tasks and contexts could help validate the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the comparison between implicit and explicit inference approaches, but does not explore other factors that may also influence incontext learning, such as architectural choices, optimization techniques, or the nature of the training data. Considering a more comprehensive set of variables could lead to a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving incontext learning abilities.
Overall, the paper presents a thoughtprovoking perspective on the relationship between representation learning and incontext adaptation. It encourages readers to think critically about the assumptions underlying common machine learning practices and to continue exploring the factors that contribute to the development of flexible and adaptable AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper challenges the assumption that simply learning the "right" latent variables is enough to guarantee good incontext learning performance. By comparing implicit and explicit approaches to learning latent variables, the paper provides insights into the complex relationship between representation learning and the ability to adapt quickly to new situations.
The key takeaway is that the path to learning the underlying factors of a problem may not directly translate to improved incontext learning capabilities. The authors suggest that researchers need to look beyond representation learning and consider a broader set of factors that influence a model's adaptability and flexibility.
These findings have important implications for the development of more capable and versatile AI systems, which will need to demonstrate not just strong representational learning, but also the ability to rapidly learn and adapt in response to new contextual information. The paper encourages further exploration of the factors that enable incontext learning, which could lead to significant advancements in the field of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies  check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve incontext learning?
Sarthak Mittal, Eric Elmoznino, Leo Gagnon, Sangnie Bhardwaj, Dhanya Sridhar, Guillaume Lajoie
Large autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through incontext learning (ICL) without learning new weights, suggesting avenues for efficiently solving new tasks. For many tasks, e.g., linear regression, the data factorizes: examples are independent given a task latent that generates the data, e.g., linear coefficients. While an optimal predictor leverages this factorization by inferring task latents, it is unclear if Transformers implicitly do so or if they instead exploit heuristics and statistical shortcuts enabled by attention layers. Both scenarios have inspired active ongoing work. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of explicitly inferring task latents. We minimally modify the Transformer architecture with a bottleneck designed to prevent shortcuts in favor of more structured solutions, and then compare performance against standard Transformers across various ICL tasks. Contrary to intuition and some recent works, we find little discernible difference between the two; biasing towards taskrelevant latent variables does not lead to better outofdistribution performance, in general. Curiously, we find that while the bottleneck effectively learns to extract latent task variables from context, downstream processing struggles to utilize them for robust prediction. Our study highlights the intrinsic limitations of Transformers in achieving structured ICL solutions that generalize, and shows that while inferring the right latents aids interpretability, it is not sufficient to alleviate this problem.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Towards Better Understanding of InContext Learning Ability from InContext Uncertainty Quantification
Shang Liu, Zhongze Cai, Guanting Chen, Xiaocheng Li
Predicting simple function classes has been widely used as a testbed for developing theory and understanding of the trained Transformer's incontext learning (ICL) ability. In this paper, we revisit the training of Transformers on linear regression tasks, and different from all the existing literature, we consider a biobjective prediction task of predicting both the conditional expectation $mathbb{E}[YX]$ and the conditional variance Var$(YX)$. This additional uncertainty quantification objective provides a handle to (i) better design outofdistribution experiments to distinguish ICL from inweight learning (IWL) and (ii) make a better separation between the algorithms with and without using the prior information of the training distribution. Theoretically, we show that the trained Transformer reaches near Bayesoptimum, suggesting the usage of the information of the training distribution. Our method can be extended to other cases. Specifically, with the Transformer's context window $S$, we prove a generalization bound of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{min{S, T}/(n T)})$ on $n$ tasks with sequences of length $T$, providing sharper analysis compared to previous results of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{1/n})$. Empirically, we illustrate that while the trained Transformer behaves as the Bayesoptimal solution as a natural consequence of supervised training in distribution, it does not necessarily perform a Bayesian inference when facing task shifts, in contrast to the textit{equivalence} between these two proposed in many existing literature. We also demonstrate the trained Transformer's ICL ability over covariates shift and promptlength shift and interpret them as a generalization over a meta distribution.
Read more5/27/2024
🖼️
0
How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in InContext Learning?
Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, PinYu Chen
Transformerbased large language models have displayed impressive incontext learning capabilities, where a pretrained model can handle new tasks without finetuning by simply augmenting the query with some inputoutput examples from that task. Despite the empirical success, the mechanics of how to train a Transformer to achieve ICL and the corresponding ICL capacity is mostly elusive due to the technical challenges of analyzing the nonconvex training problems resulting from the nonlinear selfattention and nonlinear activation in Transformers. To the best of our knowledge, this paper provides the first theoretical analysis of the training dynamics of Transformers with nonlinear selfattention and nonlinear MLP, together with the ICL generalization capability of the resulting model. Focusing on a group of binary classification tasks, we train Transformers using data from a subset of these tasks and quantify the impact of various factors on the ICL generalization performance on the remaining unseen tasks with and without data distribution shifts. We also analyze how different components in the learned Transformers contribute to the ICL performance. Furthermore, we provide the first theoretical analysis of how model pruning affects ICL performance and prove that proper magnitudebased pruning can have a minimal impact on ICL while reducing inference costs. These theoretical findings are justified through numerical experiments.
Read more6/18/2024
0
InContext Learning with Representations: Contextual Generalization of Trained Transformers
Tong Yang, Yu Huang, Yingbin Liang, Yuejie Chi
Incontext learning (ICL) refers to a remarkable capability of pretrained large language models, which can learn a new task given a few examples during inference. However, theoretical understanding of ICL is largely underexplored, particularly whether transformers can be trained to generalize to unseen examples in a prompt, which will require the model to acquire contextual knowledge of the prompt for generalization. This paper investigates the training dynamics of transformers by gradient descent through the lens of nonlinear regression tasks. The contextual generalization here can be attained via learning the template function for each task incontext, where all template functions lie in a linear space with $m$ basis functions. We analyze the training dynamics of onelayer multihead transformers to incontextly predict unlabeled inputs given partially labeled prompts, where the labels contain Gaussian noise and the number of examples in each prompt are not sufficient to determine the template. Under mild assumptions, we show that the training loss for a onelayer multihead transformer converges linearly to a global minimum. Moreover, the transformer effectively learns to perform ridge regression over the basis functions. To our knowledge, this study is the first provable demonstration that transformers can learn contextual (i.e., template) information to generalize to both unseen examples and tasks when prompts contain only a small number of queryanswer pairs.
Read more9/27/2024