Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AI

2403.20216

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/3/2024 by Robert Godwin-Jones

💬

Abstract

Generative AI offers significant opportunities for language learning. Tools like ChatGPT can provide informal second language practice through chats in written or voice forms, with the learner specifying through prompts conversational parameters such as proficiency level, language register, and discussion topics. AI can be instructed to give corrective feedback, create practice exercises, or develop an extended study plan. Instructors can use AI to build learning and assessment materials in a variety of media. AI is likely to make immersive technologies more powerful and versatile, moving away from scripted interactions. For both learners and teachers, it is important to understand the limitations of AI systems that arise from their purely statistical model of human language, which limits their ability to deal with nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use. Additionally, there are ethical concerns over how AI systems are created as well as practical constraints in their use, especially for less privileged populations. The power and versatility of AI tools are likely to turn them into valuable and constant companions in many peoples lives (akin to smartphones), creating a close connection that goes beyond simple tool use. Ecological theories such as sociomaterialism are helpful in examining the shared agency that develops through close user-AI interactions, as are the perspectives on human-object relations from Indigenous cultures.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Generative AI tools like ChatGPT offer significant opportunities for language learning
  • These tools can provide informal second language practice through written or voice chats, with customizable parameters like proficiency level, language register, and discussion topics
  • AI can be used to give corrective feedback, create practice exercises, and develop study plans
  • Instructors can leverage AI to build learning and assessment materials in various media
  • AI is likely to make immersive language learning technologies more powerful and versatile

Plain English Explanation

Generative AI tools, such as the popular ChatGPT, have the potential to revolutionize language learning. These AI systems can engage learners in conversational practice, allowing them to customize the experience to their proficiency level, the type of language they want to use, and the topics they want to discuss. The AI can even provide feedback on their language use and create tailored exercises to help them improve.

For instructors, these AI tools open up new possibilities for creating engaging learning materials and assessments in a variety of formats. By leveraging the power of AI, they can build immersive language learning experiences that go beyond traditional scripted interactions, making the learning process more dynamic and responsive to the learner's needs.

However, it's important to understand the limitations of these AI systems. Since they are based on statistical models of human language, they may struggle to capture the nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use. Additionally, there are ethical concerns and practical constraints around the development and deployment of these AI tools, especially for less privileged populations.

As generative AI becomes more prevalent, it's likely to become a constant companion for many people, much like smartphones. This close interaction between humans and AI can create a shared sense of agency, as explored by sociomaterialist theories and perspectives from Indigenous cultures on human-object relations.

Technical Explanation

The paper discusses the significant opportunities that generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, offer for language learning. These AI systems can provide informal second language practice through written or voice-based conversations, where the learner can specify parameters like proficiency level, language register, and discussion topics.

The AI can be programmed to give corrective feedback, create practice exercises, and develop personalized study plans for the learner. Instructors can also leverage these AI tools to build a variety of learning and assessment materials, including immersive experiences that go beyond scripted interactions.

However, the paper acknowledges the limitations of these AI systems, which are based on statistical models of human language. This can restrict their ability to handle the nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use. Additionally, the paper raises ethical concerns and practical constraints related to the development and deployment of these AI tools, especially for less privileged populations.

The paper suggests that as generative AI becomes more prevalent, it is likely to become a constant companion for many people, much like smartphones. This close interaction between humans and AI can create a shared sense of agency, as explored by sociomaterialist theories and perspectives from Indigenous cultures on human-object relations.

Critical Analysis

The paper does a commendable job of highlighting the potential of generative AI in language learning, particularly through the use of customizable conversational practice and the creation of learning materials. However, it also acknowledges the limitations of these AI systems, which are primarily rooted in their statistical nature and inability to fully capture the nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use.

One area that could have been explored in more depth is the potential challenges and ethical concerns around the development and deployment of these AI tools, especially for less privileged populations. The paper briefly mentions these issues but does not delve into the specifics of how they might be addressed.

Additionally, while the paper discusses the close connection that may develop between humans and generative AI tools, it could have provided more insight into the practical constraints and limitations of these interactions, particularly in terms of the AI's ability to adapt to individual learner's needs and preferences over time.

Overall, the paper offers a solid introduction to the opportunities and challenges of using generative AI in language learning, but there is room for further exploration and analysis of the more complex and nuanced issues surrounding the implementation and long-term impact of these technologies.

Conclusion

The paper highlights the significant potential of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, in transforming language learning. These AI systems can provide engaging and customizable conversational practice, as well as enable instructors to create innovative learning and assessment materials. However, the paper also acknowledges the limitations of these AI systems, particularly in their ability to capture the nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use.

As generative AI becomes more prevalent, it is likely to become a constant companion for many people, much like smartphones. This close interaction between humans and AI can create a shared sense of agency, raising interesting ethical and practical considerations that warrant further exploration and research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🌐

Generative AI: The power of the new education

Sergio Altares-L'opez, Jos'e M. Bengochea-Guevara, Carlos Ranz, H'ector Montes, Angela Ribeiro

YC

0

Reddit

0

The effective integration of generative artificial intelligence in education is a fundamental aspect to prepare future generations. This study proposes an accelerated learning methodology in artificial intelligence, focused on its generative capacity, as a way to achieve this goal. It recognizes the challenge of getting teachers to engage with new technologies and adapt their methods in all subjects, not just those related to AI. This methodology not only promotes interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, but also facilitates student understanding of the ethical uses and risks associated with AI. Students' perceptions of generative AI are examined, addressing their emotions towards its evolution, evaluation of its ethical implications, and everyday use of AI tools. In addition, AI applications commonly used by students and their integration into other disciplines are investigated. The study aims to provide educators with a deeper understanding of students' perceptions of AI and its relevance in society and in their future career paths.

Read more

5/24/2024

🔎

A social path to human-like artificial intelligence

Edgar A. Du'e~nez-Guzm'an, Suzanne Sadedin, Jane X. Wang, Kevin R. McKee, Joel Z. Leibo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Traditionally, cognitive and computer scientists have viewed intelligence solipsistically, as a property of unitary agents devoid of social context. Given the success of contemporary learning algorithms, we argue that the bottleneck in artificial intelligence (AI) progress is shifting from data assimilation to novel data generation. We bring together evidence showing that natural intelligence emerges at multiple scales in networks of interacting agents via collective living, social relationships and major evolutionary transitions, which contribute to novel data generation through mechanisms such as population pressures, arms races, Machiavellian selection, social learning and cumulative culture. Many breakthroughs in AI exploit some of these processes, from multi-agent structures enabling algorithms to master complex games like Capture-The-Flag and StarCraft II, to strategic communication in Diplomacy and the shaping of AI data streams by other AIs. Moving beyond a solipsistic view of agency to integrate these mechanisms suggests a path to human-like compounding innovation through ongoing novel data generation.

Read more

5/28/2024

📉

ChatGPT in Classrooms: Transforming Challenges into Opportunities in Education

Harris Bin Munawar, Nikolaos Misirlis

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the era of exponential technology growth, one unexpected guest has claimed a seat in classrooms worldwide, Artificial Intelligence. Generative AI, such as ChatGPT, promises a revolution in education, yet it arrives with a double-edged sword. Its potential for personalized learning is offset by issues of cheating, inaccuracies, and educators struggling to incorporate it effectively into their lesson design. We are standing on the brink of this educational frontier, and it is clear that we need to navigate this terrain with a lot of care. This is a major challenge that could undermine the integrity and value of our educational process. So, how can we turn these challenges into opportunities? When used inappropriately, AI tools can become the perfect tool for the cut copy paste mentality, and quickly begin to corrode critical thinking, creativity, and deep understanding, the most important skills in our rapidly changing world. Teachers feel that they are not equipped to leverage this technology, widening the digital divide among educators and institutions. Addressing these concerns calls for an in depth research approach. We will employ empirical research, drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, to assess the attitudes toward generative AI among educators and students. Understanding their perceptions, usage patterns, and hurdles is the first crucial step in creating an effective solution. The present study will be used as a process manual for future researchers to apply, running their own data, based on the steps explained here

Read more

5/20/2024

🤖

New!A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice

Bayode Ogunleye, Kudirat Ibilola Zakariyyah, Oluwaseun Ajao, Olakunle Olayinka, Hemlata Sharma

YC

0

Reddit

0

The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academia is a subjective and hotly debated topic. Currently, there are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education (HE) and, thus, it is still unclear how to make effective use of the technology for teaching and learning practice. This paper provides an overview of the current state of research on GenAI for teaching and learning in HE. To this end, this study conducted a systematic review of relevant studies indexed by Scopus, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search criteria revealed a total of 625 research papers, of which 355 met the final inclusion criteria. The findings from the review showed the current state and the future trends in documents, citations, document sources/authors, keywords, and co-authorship. The research gaps identified suggest that while some authors have looked at understanding the detection of AI-generated text, it may be beneficial to understand how GenAI can be incorporated into supporting the educational curriculum for assessments, teaching, and learning delivery. Furthermore, there is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration. This will strengthen the awareness and understanding of students, tutors, and other stakeholders, which will be instrumental in formulating guidelines, frameworks, and policies for GenAI usage.

Read more

6/17/2024