Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Model Generation: A Token Probability Approach
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method for detecting hallucinations in the output of large language models (LLMs).
- Hallucinations refer to the generation of content that is not grounded in the input or training data.
- The authors introduce a token probability approach to identify potentially hallucinated content in LLM-generated text.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models can sometimes produce content that is not actually based on their training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination." This paper describes a method to detect hallucinated content in LLM outputs.
The key idea is to look at the probability that the model assigns to each generated token. If the model assigns a very low probability to a token, it may indicate that the content is not well-grounded and could be hallucinated. The authors use this "token probability" approach to flag potentially hallucinated text.
This can be useful for applications like text summarization, where hallucinations could lead to inaccurate or misleading summaries. It can also help provide transparency into how LLMs are reasoning and generating content.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews related work on detecting hallucinations in LLMs, including approaches that look at semantic coherence or consistency with the input.
The authors then propose their token probability approach. For each token generated by the LLM, they calculate the probability the model assigns to that token. Tokens with very low probabilities are flagged as potentially hallucinated. This builds on the intuition that hallucinated content would likely have low model confidence.
The paper evaluates this approach on several benchmark datasets, including summarization and code generation tasks. The results show that the token probability method can effectively identify hallucinated content, outperforming alternative techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach for detecting hallucinations in LLM outputs. However, the authors acknowledge that the method has some limitations. For example, it may not work as well for very low-probability tokens that are nonetheless factually correct.
Additionally, the paper focuses on textual outputs, but hallucinations can also occur in multimodal LLMs that generate images or other content. Further research would be needed to extend the token probability approach to these domains.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards improving the transparency and reliability of large language models. By giving users better tools to identify hallucinated content, it can help build trust in these AI systems and enable more responsible application of their capabilities.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a token probability approach for detecting hallucinations in the output of large language models. By flagging low-probability tokens, the method can identify content that is not well-grounded in the model's training data. Evaluations show this technique outperforms alternative hallucination detection approaches.
While not a perfect solution, this work provides a useful tool for enhancing the reliability of LLM-generated text. As these models become more widely deployed, techniques like this will be crucial for building trust and ensuring their outputs are accurate and trustworthy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Model Generation: A Token Probability Approach
Ernesto Quevedo, Jorge Yero, Rachel Koerner, Pablo Rivas, Tomas Cerny
Concerns regarding the propensity of Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce inaccurate outputs, also known as hallucinations, have escalated. Detecting them is vital for ensuring the reliability of applications relying on LLM-generated content. Current methods often demand substantial resources and rely on extensive LLMs or employ supervised learning with multidimensional features or intricate linguistic and semantic analyses difficult to reproduce and largely depend on using the same LLM that hallucinated. This paper introduces a supervised learning approach employing two simple classifiers utilizing only four numerical features derived from tokens and vocabulary probabilities obtained from other LLM evaluators, which are not necessarily the same. The method yields promising results, surpassing state-of-the-art outcomes in multiple tasks across three different benchmarks. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive examination of the strengths and weaknesses of our approach, highlighting the significance of the features utilized and the LLM employed as an evaluator. We have released our code publicly at https://github.com/Baylor-AI/HalluDetect.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Don't Believe Everything You Read: Enhancing Summarization Interpretability through Automatic Identification of Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Priyesh Vakharia, Devavrat Joshi, Meenal Chavan, Dhananjay Sonawane, Bhrigu Garg, Parsa Mazaheri
Large Language Models (LLMs) are adept at text manipulation -- tasks such as machine translation and text summarization. However, these models can also be prone to hallucination, which can be detrimental to the faithfulness of any answers that the model provides. Recent works in combating hallucinations in LLMs deal with identifying hallucinated sentences and categorizing the different ways in which models hallucinate. This paper takes a deep dive into LLM behavior with respect to hallucinations, defines a token-level approach to identifying different kinds of hallucinations, and further utilizes this token-level tagging to improve the interpretability and faithfulness of LLMs in dialogue summarization tasks. Through this, the paper presents a new, enhanced dataset and a new training paradigm.
Read more4/4/2024
0
Cost-Effective Hallucination Detection for LLMs
Simon Valentin, Jinmiao Fu, Gianluca Detommaso, Shaoyuan Xu, Giovanni Zappella, Bryan Wang
Large language models (LLMs) can be prone to hallucinations - generating unreliable outputs that are unfaithful to their inputs, external facts or internally inconsistent. In this work, we address several challenges for post-hoc hallucination detection in production settings. Our pipeline for hallucination detection entails: first, producing a confidence score representing the likelihood that a generated answer is a hallucination; second, calibrating the score conditional on attributes of the inputs and candidate response; finally, performing detection by thresholding the calibrated score. We benchmark a variety of state-of-the-art scoring methods on different datasets, encompassing question answering, fact checking, and summarization tasks. We employ diverse LLMs to ensure a comprehensive assessment of performance. We show that calibrating individual scoring methods is critical for ensuring risk-aware downstream decision making. Based on findings that no individual score performs best in all situations, we propose a multi-scoring framework, which combines different scores and achieves top performance across all datasets. We further introduce cost-effective multi-scoring, which can match or even outperform more expensive detection methods, while significantly reducing computational overhead.
Read more8/12/2024
0
InterrogateLLM: Zero-Resource Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated Answers
Yakir Yehuda, Itzik Malkiel, Oren Barkan, Jonathan Weill, Royi Ronen, Noam Koenigstein
Despite the many advances of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their unprecedented rapid evolution, their impact and integration into every facet of our daily lives is limited due to various reasons. One critical factor hindering their widespread adoption is the occurrence of hallucinations, where LLMs invent answers that sound realistic, yet drift away from factual truth. In this paper, we present a novel method for detecting hallucinations in large language models, which tackles a critical issue in the adoption of these models in various real-world scenarios. Through extensive evaluations across multiple datasets and LLMs, including Llama-2, we study the hallucination levels of various recent LLMs and demonstrate the effectiveness of our method to automatically detect them. Notably, we observe up to 87% hallucinations for Llama-2 in a specific experiment, where our method achieves a Balanced Accuracy of 81%, all without relying on external knowledge.
Read more8/20/2024