Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Language models can be prompted to perform a wide range of tasks, but their performance varies significantly depending on the choice of prompt.
- Researchers don't yet fully understand why this prompt-based performance variance occurs or how to select the best prompts.
- This paper analyzes the factors that contribute to this variance and proposes a new hypothesis: the performance of a prompt is linked to the extent to which the model is familiar with the language it contains.
Plain English Explanation
The research suggests that language models - powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - can be given specific prompts to perform a wide variety of tasks, from answering questions to generating stories. However, the performance of these language models can vary greatly depending on the exact wording of the prompt.
The researchers wanted to understand why this prompt-based performance variance occurs and how to choose the best prompts. Their key finding is that the performance of a prompt is linked to how familiar the language model is with the words and phrases it contains.
Specifically, the researchers found that the lower the "perplexity" (a measure of how surprised or confused the model is by the prompt) of a prompt, the better the language model will perform on the associated task. This suggests that creating prompts using language the model is very familiar with - for example, by paraphrasing and backtranslating a small set of manually-written prompts - can lead to significant improvements in the model's performance.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments across a wide range of tasks to test their hypothesis that prompt performance is linked to the model's familiarity with the prompt language. They found that prompts with lower perplexity - meaning the language model is more confident and less confused by the prompt - generally led to better task performance.
Based on this finding, the researchers devised a method for creating high-performing prompts:
- Expand a small set of manually-written prompts: They used GPT-3 to automatically paraphrase and backtranslate the initial prompts, generating a larger pool of prompt variations.
- Select the lowest-perplexity prompts: From this expanded set, they chose the prompts that had the lowest perplexity scores, indicating the language model was most familiar and comfortable with that wording.
This approach of leveraging the model's own familiarity with the prompt language led to significant gains in performance across the tested tasks, compared to using the original manually-written prompts.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide a compelling hypothesis and evidence that the performance of language model prompts is closely tied to the model's familiarity with the prompt wording. This aligns with our general understanding that language models perform best on inputs they are well-trained on.
However, the researchers acknowledge that there may be other factors beyond just perplexity that contribute to prompt performance, such as the inherent difficulty of the task or the model's broader understanding of the task domain. Additionally, the researchers focused on a limited set of tasks and language models, so the generalizability of their findings remains to be fully explored.
Further research could investigate how this prompt optimization approach scales to more diverse tasks and model architectures, as well as whether there are other prompt characteristics (beyond just perplexity) that could be leveraged to improve performance. Additionally, a deeper exploration of the cognitive and representational mechanisms underlying the link between prompt perplexity and task performance could yield valuable insights.
Conclusion
This research offers a promising new direction for improving the performance of language models on a wide variety of tasks through the careful selection and optimization of prompts. By leveraging the model's own familiarity with prompt wording, as measured by perplexity, the researchers demonstrated significant gains in task performance.
These findings have important implications for the practical application of language models, as well as our fundamental understanding of how they work. By shedding light on the factors that influence prompt-based performance, this research brings us closer to unlocking the full potential of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation
Hila Gonen, Srini Iyer, Terra Blevins, Noah A. Smith, Luke Zettlemoyer
Language models can be prompted to perform a wide variety of zero- and few-shot learning problems. However, performance varies significantly with the choice of prompt, and we do not yet understand why this happens or how to pick the best prompts. In this work, we analyze the factors that contribute to this variance and establish a new empirical hypothesis: the performance of a prompt is coupled with the extent to which the model is familiar with the language it contains. Over a wide range of tasks, we show that the lower the perplexity of the prompt is, the better the prompt is able to perform the task. As a result, we devise a method for creating prompts: (1) automatically extend a small seed set of manually written prompts by paraphrasing using GPT3 and backtranslation and (2) choose the lowest perplexity prompts to get significant gains in performance.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Monotonic Paraphrasing Improves Generalization of Language Model Prompting
Qin Liu, Fei Wang, Nan Xu, Tianyi Yan, Tao Meng, Muhao Chen
Performance of large language models (LLMs) may vary with different prompts or instructions of even the same task. One commonly recognized factor for this phenomenon is the model's familiarity with the given prompt or instruction, which is typically estimated by its perplexity. However, finding the prompt with the lowest perplexity is challenging, given the enormous space of possible prompting phrases. In this paper, we propose monotonic paraphrasing (MonoPara), an end-to-end decoding strategy that paraphrases given prompts or instructions into their lower perplexity counterparts based on an ensemble of a paraphrase LM for prompt (or instruction) rewriting, and a target LM (i.e. the prompt or instruction executor) that constrains the generation for lower perplexity. The ensemble decoding process can efficiently paraphrase the original prompt without altering its semantic meaning, while monotonically decreasing the perplexity of each generation as calculated by the target LM. We explore in detail both greedy and search-based decoding as two alternative decoding schemes of MonoPara. Notably, MonoPara does not require any training and can monotonically lower the perplexity of the paraphrased prompt or instruction, leading to improved performance of zero-shot LM prompting as evaluated on a wide selection of tasks. In addition, MonoPara is also shown to effectively improve LMs' generalization on perturbed and unseen task instructions.
Read more4/19/2024
0
Understanding the Relationship between Prompts and Response Uncertainty in Large Language Models
Ze Yu Zhang, Arun Verma, Finale Doshi-Velez, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in decision-making, but their reliability, especially in critical tasks like healthcare, is not well-established. Therefore, understanding how LLMs reason and make decisions is crucial for their safe deployment. This paper investigates how the uncertainty of responses generated by LLMs relates to the information provided in the input prompt. Leveraging the insight that LLMs learn to infer latent concepts during pretraining, we propose a prompt-response concept model that explains how LLMs generate responses and helps understand the relationship between prompts and response uncertainty. We show that the uncertainty decreases as the prompt's informativeness increases, similar to epistemic uncertainty. Our detailed experimental results on real datasets validate our proposed model.
Read more8/23/2024
0
On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Models
Bowen Cao, Deng Cai, Zhisong Zhang, Yuexian Zou, Wai Lam
The performance of large language models (LLMs) is acutely sensitive to the phrasing of prompts, which raises significant concerns about their reliability in real-world scenarios. Existing studies often divide prompts into task-level instructions and case-level inputs and primarily focus on evaluating and improving robustness against variations in tasks-level instructions. However, this setup fails to fully address the diversity of real-world user queries and assumes the existence of task-specific datasets. To address these limitations, we introduce RobustAlpacaEval, a new benchmark that consists of semantically equivalent case-level queries and emphasizes the importance of using the worst prompt performance to gauge the lower bound of model performance. Extensive experiments on RobustAlpacaEval with ChatGPT and six open-source LLMs from the Llama, Mistral, and Gemma families uncover substantial variability in model performance; for instance, a difference of 45.48% between the worst and best performance for the Llama-2-70B-chat model, with its worst performance dipping as low as 9.38%. We further illustrate the difficulty in identifying the worst prompt from both model-agnostic and model-dependent perspectives, emphasizing the absence of a shortcut to characterize the worst prompt. We also attempt to enhance the worst prompt performance using existing prompt engineering and prompt consistency methods, but find that their impact is limited. These findings underscore the need to create more resilient LLMs that can maintain high performance across diverse prompts. Data and code are available at https://github.com/cbwbuaa/On-the-Worst-Prompt- Performance-of-LLMs.
Read more6/24/2024