0
0
Delving into Differentially Private Transformer
Overview
- This paper explores the challenge of training Transformer models with differential privacy (DP), a technique to protect the privacy of training data.
- The authors propose two key solutions to address the unique challenges of training DP Transformers: the Re-Attention Mechanism and Phantom Clipping.
- The paper aims to provide a modular approach to advance research in the field of differentially private deep learning.
Modular treatment focuses on the first reduction step.
1/4
Original caption: Figure 1: The modular treatment in this work, where the focus of this work is on the first ‘reduction’.
Error propagation analysis for ReLU and GELU activations.
1/2
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the challenge of training a type of machine learning model called a Transformer while also protecting the privacy of the data used to train the model. Transformers are a powerful type of model that has been widely used in areas like natural language processing.
The authors identified two main issues with training Transformers with differential privacy. First, the attention mechanism in Transformers can be "distracted" by the privacy-preserving noise, reducing the model's accuracy. Second, existing techniques for efficiently clipping the gradients (a key step in the training process) don't work well with Transformers.
To address these challenges, the authors propose two new techniques:
- Re-Attention Mechanism: This helps the Transformer model focus on the right parts of the input, even with the privacy-preserving noise.
- Phantom Clipping: This is a new way to efficiently clip the gradients during Transformer training with differential privacy.
By addressing these key issues, the authors believe their work can help advance the field of training machine learning models, like Transformers, in a privacy-preserving way. This is an important area of research as machine learning models are increasingly used in applications that involve sensitive personal data.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a modular approach to training Transformer models with differential privacy (DP). The authors first identify two key challenges unique to DP Transformer training: the attention distraction phenomenon and the lack of compatibility with existing techniques for efficient gradient clipping.
To address the attention distraction issue, the authors propose the Re-Attention Mechanism. This mechanism helps the Transformer model focus on the relevant parts of the input, even in the presence of privacy-preserving noise.
For the gradient clipping problem, the authors introduce Phantom Clipping. This is a new technique that enables efficient gradient clipping for Transformer models trained with differential privacy, overcoming the limitations of existing approaches.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their solutions through experiments on various Transformer-based models, including BERT and GPT-2. The results show that their techniques can significantly improve the accuracy of DP Transformer models compared to baseline methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-structured and comprehensive approach to the problem of training Transformer models with differential privacy. The authors' identification of the two key challenges, and their proposed solutions, are thoughtful and well-grounded in the existing literature.
One potential limitation of the work is the lack of a deeper exploration of the theoretical underpinnings of the attention distraction phenomenon and the gradient clipping incompatibility. While the authors provide intuitive explanations, a more rigorous analysis of the underlying mechanisms could strengthen the work.
Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more extensive evaluation of the proposed techniques across a wider range of Transformer-based models and tasks. This would help validate the generalizability of the authors' findings.
Finally, the authors could consider discussing potential real-world applications and implications of their research, as well as any ethical considerations that may arise from deploying DP Transformer models in sensitive domains.
Conclusion
This paper presents a modular approach to training Transformer models with differential privacy, a crucial capability as machine learning models are increasingly used in applications involving sensitive data. The authors' identification of the key challenges and their proposed solutions, the Re-Attention Mechanism and Phantom Clipping, represent important advancements in the field of differentially private deep learning.
By addressing these fundamental issues, the authors have laid the groundwork for further research and development of privacy-preserving Transformer models, with potential applications in natural language processing, task-oriented dialogue systems, and other domains where both model accuracy and data privacy are paramount.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
0
Related Papers
0
Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
David Zagardo
Imagine training a machine learning model with Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), only to discover post-training that the noise level was either too high, crippling your model's utility, or too low, compromising privacy. The dreaded realization hits: you must start the lengthy training process from scratch. But what if you could avoid this retraining nightmare? In this study, we introduce a groundbreaking approach (to our knowledge) that applies differential privacy noise to the model's weights after training. We offer a comprehensive mathematical proof for this novel approach's privacy bounds, use formal methods to validate its privacy guarantees, and empirically evaluate its effectiveness using membership inference attacks and performance evaluations. This method allows for a single training run, followed by post-hoc noise adjustments to achieve optimal privacy-utility trade-offs. We compare this novel fine-tuned model (DP-Weights model) to a traditional DP-SGD model, demonstrating that our approach yields statistically similar performance and privacy guarantees. Our results validate the efficacy of post-training noise application, promising significant time savings and flexibility in fine-tuning differential privacy parameters, making it a practical alternative for deploying differentially private models in real-world scenarios.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data
Zhiqi Bu, Xinwei Zhang, Mingyi Hong, Sheng Zha, George Karypis
The superior performance of large foundation models relies on the use of massive amounts of high-quality data, which often contain sensitive, private and copyrighted material that requires formal protection. While differential privacy (DP) is a prominent method to gauge the degree of security provided to the models, its application is commonly limited to the model fine-tuning stage, due to the performance degradation when applying DP during the pre-training stage. Consequently, DP is yet not capable of protecting a substantial portion of the data used during the initial pre-training process. In this work, we first provide a theoretical understanding of the efficacy of DP training by analyzing the per-iteration loss improvement. We make a key observation that DP optimizers' performance degradation can be significantly mitigated by the use of limited public data, which leads to a novel DP continual pre-training strategy. Empirically, using only 10% of public data, our strategy can achieve DP accuracy of 41.5% on ImageNet-21k (with $epsilon=8$), as well as non-DP accuracy of 55.7% and and 60.0% on downstream tasks Places365 and iNaturalist-2021, respectively, on par with state-of-the-art standard pre-training and substantially outperforming existing DP pre-trained models. Our DP pre-trained models are released in fastDP library (https://github.com/awslabs/fast-differential-privacy/releases/tag/v2.1)
Read more10/30/2024
0
Differentially Private Continual Learning using Pre-Trained Models
Marlon Tobaben, Marcus Klasson, Rui Li, Arno Solin, Antti Honkela
This work explores the intersection of continual learning (CL) and differential privacy (DP). Crucially, continual learning models must retain knowledge across tasks, but this conflicts with the differential privacy requirement of restricting individual samples to be memorised in the model. We propose using pre-trained models to address the trade-offs between privacy and performance in a continual learning setting. More specifically, we present necessary assumptions to enable privacy-preservation and propose combining pre-trained models with parameter-free classifiers and parameter-efficient adapters that are learned under differential privacy. Our experiments demonstrate their effectiveness and provide insights into balancing the competing demands of continual learning and privacy.
Read more11/11/2024
🔄
0
Beyond the Mean: Differentially Private Prototypes for Private Transfer Learning
Dariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic, Franziska Boenisch
Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to leak private information from their training datasets. Differential Privacy (DP), typically implemented through the differential private stochastic gradient descent algorithm (DP-SGD), has become the standard solution to bound leakage from the models. Despite recent improvements, DP-SGD-based approaches for private learning still usually struggle in the high privacy ($varepsilonle1)$ and low data regimes, and when the private training datasets are imbalanced. To overcome these limitations, we propose Differentially Private Prototype Learning (DPPL) as a new paradigm for private transfer learning. DPPL leverages publicly pre-trained encoders to extract features from private data and generates DP prototypes that represent each private class in the embedding space and can be publicly released for inference. Since our DP prototypes can be obtained from only a few private training data points and without iterative noise addition, they offer high-utility predictions and strong privacy guarantees even under the notion of pure DP. We additionally show that privacy-utility trade-offs can be further improved when leveraging the public data beyond pre-training of the encoder: in particular, we can privately sample our DP prototypes from the publicly available data points used to train the encoder. Our experimental evaluation with four state-of-the-art encoders, four vision datasets, and under different data and imbalancedness regimes demonstrate DPPL's high performance under strong privacy guarantees in challenging private learning setups.
Read more6/13/2024