Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation

2404.12056

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/19/2024 by Steffen Holter, Mennatallah El-Assady
Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation

Abstract

As full AI-based automation remains out of reach in most real-world applications, the focus has instead shifted to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI agents, creating effective collaborative systems. The rapid advances in this area have yielded increasingly more complex systems and frameworks, while the nuance of their characterization has gotten more vague. Similarly, the existing conceptual models no longer capture the elaborate processes of these systems nor describe the entire scope of their collaboration paradigms. In this paper, we propose a new unified set of dimensions through which to analyze and describe human-AI systems. Our conceptual model is centered around three high-level aspects - agency, interaction, and adaptation - and is developed through a multi-step process. Firstly, an initial design space is proposed by surveying the literature and consolidating existing definitions and conceptual frameworks. Secondly, this model is iteratively refined and validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with nine researchers in this field. Lastly, to illustrate the applicability of our design space, we utilize it to provide a structured description of selected human-AI systems.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the dynamics of human-AI collaboration, focusing on the concepts of agency, interaction, and adaptation.
  • The researchers investigate how humans and AI systems can effectively work together by examining the interplay between their respective roles, decision-making processes, and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
  • The study aims to provide insights into the design and implementation of human-AI collaborative systems that can enhance productivity, decision-making, and overall performance.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems can work together effectively. It looks at the roles and decision-making processes of both humans and AI, and how they can adapt to changing situations.

The key ideas are:

Negotiating Shared Agency Between Humans and AI - Exploring how humans and AI can share control and decision-making in collaborative tasks.

Collaborative Human-AI Trust (CHAI-T) Process - Examining how trust can be built between humans and AI through an iterative process of interaction and adaptation.

Designing for Human-Agent Alignment: Understanding What Humans Want - Focusing on aligning the goals and actions of humans and AI to work towards common objectives.

The Interplay of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Education - Exploring how human-AI collaboration can be applied in educational settings to enhance learning and teaching.

Synergising Human-like Responses with Machine Intelligence for Planning - Investigating how AI can mimic human decision-making and communication to improve collaborative planning.

The overall aim is to provide insights that can help design and implement human-AI collaborative systems that are more productive, effective, and adaptable.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the dynamics of human-AI collaboration, focusing on the key concepts of agency, interaction, and adaptation. The researchers investigate how humans and AI systems can effectively work together by exploring the interplay between their respective roles, decision-making processes, and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances.

The study employs a multi-faceted approach, drawing insights from various fields, including Negotiating Shared Agency Between Humans and AI, Collaborative Human-AI Trust (CHAI-T) Process, Designing for Human-Agent Alignment: Understanding What Humans Want, The Interplay of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Education, and Synergising Human-like Responses with Machine Intelligence for Planning.

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the various factors that contribute to effective human-AI collaboration, including the distribution of control and decision-making, the building of trust and alignment between humans and AI, and the ability of both parties to adapt to changing circumstances.

The researchers employ a range of experimental and observational methods to explore these concepts, including user studies, task-based evaluations, and computational modeling. The insights gained from this research can inform the design and implementation of human-AI collaborative systems that are more productive, effective, and adaptable in a variety of real-world applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough and well-researched examination of human-AI collaboration, highlighting important considerations and potential areas for further exploration. However, the study does acknowledge some caveats and limitations that warrant further investigation.

One key limitation is the context-specific nature of the findings, as the researchers note that the dynamics of human-AI collaboration may vary depending on the specific task, domain, and the characteristics of the AI system. Additionally, the paper recognizes the need for longitudinal studies to better understand how human-AI relationships and trust evolve over time.

Another area for further research is the potential for bias and ethical concerns in human-AI collaborations. The paper briefly touches on these issues, but more in-depth analysis of the potential risks and mitigation strategies would be valuable.

Furthermore, the paper could have delved deeper into the cognitive and psychological aspects of human-AI interaction, exploring how factors such as user familiarity, task complexity, and individual differences might influence the collaborative dynamics.

Despite these limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of human-AI collaboration and provides a solid foundation for future research in this rapidly evolving field. The insights and frameworks presented in the study can inform the design of more effective and user-centric human-AI collaborative systems.

Conclusion

This paper offers a comprehensive exploration of the dynamics of human-AI collaboration, focusing on the key concepts of agency, interaction, and adaptation. The researchers draw from a diverse range of fields to provide a multifaceted understanding of how humans and AI systems can work together effectively.

The study's findings have important implications for the design and implementation of human-AI collaborative systems across various domains, including education, decision-making, and task planning. By addressing the complexities of human-AI interaction and the need for adaptive and trustworthy collaborative processes, this work can contribute to the development of more productive, efficient, and ethically-aligned human-AI partnerships.

As the integration of AI technologies continues to expand, the insights gained from this research can help guide the responsible and effective integration of human and machine intelligence, ultimately enhancing our ability to tackle complex challenges and achieve shared goals.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Negotiating the Shared Agency between Humans & AI in the Recommender System

Negotiating the Shared Agency between Humans & AI in the Recommender System

Mengke Wu, Weizi Liu, Yanyun Wang, Mike Yao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Smart recommendation algorithms have revolutionized information dissemination, enhancing efficiency and reshaping content delivery across various domains. However, concerns about user agency have arisen due to the inherent opacity (information asymmetry) and the nature of one-way output (power asymmetry) on algorithms. While both issues have been criticized by scholars via advocating explainable AI (XAI) and human-AI collaborative decision-making (HACD), few research evaluates their integrated effects on users, and few HACD discussions in recommender systems beyond improving and filtering the results. This study proposes an incubating idea as a missing step in HACD that allows users to control the degrees of AI-recommended content. Then, we integrate it with existing XAI to a flow prototype aimed at assessing the enhancement of user agency. We seek to understand how types of agency impact user perception and experience, and bring empirical evidence to refine the guidelines and designs for human-AI interactive systems.

Read more

4/23/2024

šŸ”—

Towards Human-AI Mutual Learning: A New Research Paradigm

Xiaomei Wang, Xiaoyu Chen

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper describes a new research paradigm for studying human-AI collaboration, named human-AI mutual learning, defined as the process where humans and AI agents preserve, exchange, and improve knowledge during human-AI collaboration. We describe relevant methodologies, motivations, domain examples, benefits, challenges, and future research agenda under this paradigm.

Read more

5/9/2024

Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective

Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective

Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, Subbarao Kambhampati

YC

0

Reddit

0

From its inception, AI has had a rather ambivalent relationship with humans -- swinging between their augmentation and replacement. Now, as AI technologies enter our everyday lives at an ever increasing pace, there is a greater need for AI systems to work synergistically with humans. One critical requirement for such synergistic human-AI interaction is that the AI systems be explainable to the humans in the loop. To do this effectively, AI agents need to go beyond planning with their own models of the world, and take into account the mental model of the human in the loop. Drawing from several years of research in our lab, we will discuss how the AI agent can use these mental models to either conform to human expectations, or change those expectations through explanatory communication. While the main focus of the book is on cooperative scenarios, we will point out how the same mental models can be used for obfuscation and deception. Although the book is primarily driven by our own research in these areas, in every chapter, we will provide ample connections to relevant research from other groups.

Read more

5/28/2024

From Explainable to Interactive AI: A Literature Review on Current Trends in Human-AI Interaction

From Explainable to Interactive AI: A Literature Review on Current Trends in Human-AI Interaction

Muhammad Raees, Inge Meijerink, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Vassilis-Javed Khan, Konstantinos Papangelis

YC

0

Reddit

0

AI systems are increasingly being adopted across various domains and application areas. With this surge, there is a growing research focus and societal concern for actively involving humans in developing, operating, and adopting these systems. Despite this concern, most existing literature on AI and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) primarily focuses on explaining how AI systems operate and, at times, allowing users to contest AI decisions. Existing studies often overlook more impactful forms of user interaction with AI systems, such as giving users agency beyond contestability and enabling them to adapt and even co-design the AI's internal mechanics. In this survey, we aim to bridge this gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art in Human-Centered AI literature, the domain where AI and HCI studies converge, extending past Explainable and Contestable AI, delving into the Interactive AI and beyond. Our analysis contributes to shaping the trajectory of future Interactive AI design and advocates for a more user-centric approach that provides users with greater agency, fostering not only their understanding of AI's workings but also their active engagement in its development and evolution.

Read more

5/27/2024