A Comprehensive Survey of Small Language Models in the Era of Large Language Models: Techniques, Enhancements, Applications, Collaboration with LLMs, and Trustworthiness

Published 11/7/2024 by Fali Wang, Zhiwei Zhang, Xianren Zhang, Zongyu Wu, Tzuhao Mo, Qiuhao Lu, Wanjing Wang, Rui Li, Junjie Xu, Xianfeng Tang and 4 others

Overview

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of small language models (SLMs) in the era of large language models (LLMs).
It covers techniques, enhancements, applications, collaboration with LLMs, and trustworthiness of SLMs.
The survey aims to highlight the important role of SLMs alongside the growing prominence of LLMs.

LLM download trends by model size on Hugging Face.

1/3

Original caption: Figure 2. Download Statistics Last Month in Huggingface for LLMs with Various Model Sizes, obtained on October 7, 2024.

Quantization methods.

1/2

Method	Bitwidth	Type	Technical Contribution	Problems Addressed
SqueezeLLM (Kim et al., 2023b)	3-bit	PTQ	Sensitivity-based non-uniform quantization, dense and sparse decomposition	Ultra-low bit quantization
JSQ (Guo et al., 2024a)	Flexible	PTQ	Joint Sparsification and Quantization	Improved compression-accuracy trade-offs
FrameQuant (Adepu et al., 2024)	Fractional bit	PTQ	Fractional bit widths	Improved compression-accuracy trade-offs
OneBit (Xu et al., 2024)	1-bit	PTQ	Quantization-aware knowledge distillation	1-bit quantization
BiLLM (Huang et al., 2024b)	1-bit	PTQ	Crucial Weights Selection, Block-based error compensation	1-bit quantization
LQER (Zhang et al., 2024c)	Flexible	PTQ	Quantization Error Minimization	Improved compression-accuracy trade-offs
I-LLM (Hu et al., 2024a)	Flexible	PTQ	Fully-Smooth Block-Reconstruction, Dynamic Integer-only MatMul and Integer-only Non-linear Operators	Integer-only Quantization
PV-Tuning (Malinovskii et al., 2024)	1-bit/2-bit	PTQ	PV algorithm	Improved compression-accuracy trade-offs
BitNet (Wang et al., 2023e)	1-bit	QAT	1-bit Transformer Architecture	1-bit quantization
BitNet b1.58 (Ma et al., 2024)	{-1, 0, 1}	QAT	Ternary Parameters	1-bit quantization
PEQA (Kim et al., 2024a)	Flexible	QAT	Quantization Scales Optimization	Parameter-Efficient Finetuning
QLoRA (Dettmers et al., 2024)	NF4	QAT	4-bit NormalFloat and Double Quantization	Parameter-Efficient Finetuning

Original caption: Table 1. Representative quantization methods.

Criteria	Pruning	Knowledge Distillation	Quantization	Low-Rank Techniques
Definition	Removes unnecessary model parameters.	Transfers knowledge from a larger model (teacher) to a smaller model (student).	Reduces the precision of model parameters.	Decomposes weight matrices into low-rank approximations.
Goal	Reduce model size and computation.	Create smaller models with similar performance to larger ones.	Reduce model size and accelerate inference.	Reduce model parameters and computation.
Method	Identifying and removing less important weights or layers.	Training a smaller model to mimic the output of a larger model.	Converting parameters to lower precision formats (e.g., 8-bit instead of 32-bit).	Decomposing matrices into low-rank components.
Advantages	Significant reduction in size and computation.	Preserves performance in smaller models.	Faster inference and reduced storage requirements.	Improved efficiency and often maintains performance.
Disadvantages	Potential for accuracy loss, can introduce irregular memory access patterns.	Resource-intensive due to teacher model requirements.	Potential for accuracy loss, may require specialized hardware.	Effectiveness varies depending on the specific application and rank selection.
Model Size Impact	High reduction potential.	Significant reduction.	High reduction, dependent on precision.	Moderate reduction, focusing on redundant parameters.
Performance Impact	Potential accuracy degradation if pruning is excessive.	Preserves performance if distillation is successful.	Minor to moderate loss depending on the quantization method.	Generally retains performance, but may need further tuning.
Complexity	Moderate, requires parameter importance evaluation.	High, involves training two models (teacher and student).	Moderate, complexity varies based on the precision level.	Moderate, requires matrix decomposition and rank selection.
Use Cases	Resource-constrained environments.	Creating models for resource-limited devices.	Applications needing fast inference, including edge devices.	Applications with redundant weight matrices.

Original caption: Table 2. Comparison of Model Compression Techniques

Plain English Explanation

Language models are artificial intelligence systems that can understand and generate human-like text. Small language models (SLMs) are a type of language model that are relatively compact and efficient compared to the large language models (LLMs) that have become increasingly popular in recent years.

This paper explores the various aspects of SLMs, including the architectural techniques used to build them, the ways they can be enhanced to improve their performance, and the real-world applications where they can be useful.

The paper also discusses how SLMs can collaborate with LLMs to leverage the strengths of both model types, as well as the trustworthiness considerations around deploying SLMs in various settings.

The key idea is that even as LLMs become more prominent, SLMs still have an important role to play in the field of natural language processing and generation. This survey aims to highlight the value and potential of SLMs in the evolving landscape of language AI.

Key Findings

SLMs can be built using a variety of architectural techniques, including parameter-efficient transformers, knowledge distillation, and sparse models.
There are numerous ways to enhance SLMs, such as through prompt engineering, few-shot learning, and multi-task training.
SLMs have found diverse applications, from conversational AI to code generation and analysis.
SLMs can collaborate with LLMs to leverage the strengths of both model types, such as by using SLMs for efficiency-critical tasks and LLMs for more complex ones.
Trustworthiness is an important consideration for deploying SLMs, particularly in areas like security, privacy, and bias mitigation.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by outlining the foundational concepts in building language models, including the architectural techniques used for SLMs. These include parameter-efficient transformers, knowledge distillation, and sparse models, which aim to reduce the size and computational requirements of the models while maintaining performance.

The authors then discuss various enhancement techniques for SLMs, such as prompt engineering, few-shot learning, and multi-task training. These approaches can help improve the capabilities and performance of SLMs in different application domains.

The paper also explores the diverse applications of SLMs, ranging from conversational AI and text generation to code analysis and machine translation. The authors highlight how SLMs can be deployed in efficiency-critical settings where their smaller size and faster inference time are advantageous.

Furthermore, the paper delves into the collaboration between SLMs and LLMs, exploring how the two model types can complement each other. SLMs can be used for specific, efficiency-critical tasks, while LLMs can handle more complex, open-ended language generation challenges.

Finally, the paper addresses the trustworthiness considerations around SLMs, such as security, privacy, and bias mitigation. The authors discuss the unique challenges and potential solutions for ensuring the responsible deployment of SLMs in real-world applications.

Implications for the Field

This comprehensive survey of SLMs in the era of LLMs serves to highlight the continued importance and potential of smaller, more efficient language models. While LLMs have garnered significant attention and resources, the authors emphasize that SLMs can play a crucial role in extending the reach and applications of language AI, particularly in resource-constrained environments or settings where efficiency is paramount.

By delving into the techniques, enhancements, and use cases for SLMs, the paper provides a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the field of natural language processing. It encourages the exploration and development of SLMs as a complementary approach to the dominant LLM paradigm, potentially leading to more diverse and accessible language AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured survey of SLMs, covering a wide range of relevant topics. However, some potential areas for further research or discussion include:

Benchmarking and Evaluation: The paper could have included more in-depth analysis of how SLMs perform compared to LLMs on standard language benchmarks and tasks. This could help provide a clearer picture of the relative strengths and limitations of the two model types.
Scalability and Transferability: While the paper discusses enhancements to SLMs, it could have explored the challenges and potential solutions for scaling up SLMs to handle larger datasets and more complex language tasks, as well as the transferability of SLM capabilities to new domains.
Ethical Considerations: The section on trustworthiness touches on important issues like security and bias, but could have delved deeper into the broader ethical implications of deploying SLMs, such as their impact on accessibility, fairness, and societal well-being.

Overall, the paper offers a valuable contribution to the understanding and exploration of SLMs in the context of the growing prominence of LLMs. It serves as a useful reference for researchers and practitioners interested in exploring the role and potential of smaller, more efficient language models in the evolving landscape of natural language AI.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey of small language models (SLMs) in the era of large language models (LLMs) highlights the continued importance and potential of compact, efficient language models alongside the growing dominance of their larger counterparts.

The paper explores the architectural techniques, enhancement methods, applications, collaboration with LLMs, and trustworthiness considerations surrounding SLMs, providing a detailed overview of the current state of the field. While LLMs have garnered significant attention and resources, the authors emphasize that SLMs can play a crucial role in extending the reach and applications of language AI, particularly in resource-constrained environments or settings where efficiency is paramount.

By delving into the various aspects of SLMs, this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the field of natural language processing. It encourages the exploration and development of SLMs as a complementary approach to the dominant LLM paradigm, potentially leading to more diverse and accessible language AI systems that can benefit a wide range of applications and users.

Full paper

Loading PDF viewer...

Read original: arXiv:2411.03350

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →