Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller
171
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper describes a new collaborative text editing system called "Eg-walker" that aims to be better, faster, and smaller than existing approaches.
- Eg-walker uses a novel approach called "Conflict-free Replicated Data Types" (CRDTs) to enable fast and consistent collaborative editing without expensive reconciliation.
- The authors claim Eg-walker outperforms existing systems in terms of latency, bandwidth usage, and conflict resolution.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new collaborative text editing system called "Eg-walker" that improves on existing approaches. Collaborative text editing allows multiple people to work on the same document simultaneously, which can be challenging to coordinate.
Eg-walker uses a technique called CRDTs to enable fast and consistent editing without expensive reconciliation. CRDTs allow the document to be replicated across devices, with changes automatically merged without causing conflicts.
The authors claim Eg-walker is better, faster, and smaller than existing collaborative text editing systems. It has lower latency, uses less network bandwidth, and resolves editing conflicts more effectively than other approaches like operational transformation.
Technical Explanation
The core innovation in Eg-walker is its use of CRDTs to enable consistent collaborative editing. CRDTs allow the document state to be replicated across devices, with each device independently applying edits. The CRDT algorithm ensures that all replicas eventually converge to the same state, even in the face of concurrent modifications.
This contrasts with traditional operational transformation approaches, which require a central coordinator to manage and reconcile edits. Eg-walker's decentralized, conflict-free design allows it to achieve lower latency and bandwidth usage.
The authors evaluate Eg-walker's performance through a series of experiments, comparing it to other collaborative editing systems. They find that Eg-walker has significantly lower latency, especially for large documents, and uses less network bandwidth. Eg-walker also demonstrates more robust conflict resolution, as described in the paper "Don't Step on My Toes: Resolving Editing Conflicts".
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling technical solution to the challenges of collaborative text editing. The use of CRDTs is a well-established approach, but the authors have demonstrated how it can be effectively applied to this domain.
One potential limitation is that the paper does not address the complexity of integrating Eg-walker into existing text editing workflows and applications. While the technical performance is impressive, the user experience and integration aspects are not covered.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the implications of Eg-walker's decentralized design on aspects like data privacy, security, and auditability. These are important considerations for real-world collaborative editing use cases.
Further research could explore how Eg-walker's CRDT-based approach could be extended to richer text formatting and collaborative features beyond simple text editing.
Conclusion
The Eg-walker collaborative text editing system presented in this paper offers a novel and technically superior approach compared to existing solutions. By leveraging CRDTs, Eg-walker achieves lower latency, reduced bandwidth usage, and more robust conflict resolution, making it an attractive option for real-time collaborative text editing applications.
While the paper focuses on the technical details, further research is needed to address the user experience and security/privacy implications of Eg-walker's decentralized design. Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the field of collaborative text editing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
171
Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller
Joseph Gentle, Martin Kleppmann
Collaborative text editing algorithms allow several users to concurrently modify a text file, and automatically merge concurrent edits into a consistent state. Existing algorithms fall in two categories: Operational Transformation (OT) algorithms are slow to merge files that have diverged substantially due to offline editing; CRDTs are slow to load and consume a lot of memory. We introduce Eg-walker, a collaboration algorithm for text that avoids these weaknesses. Compared to existing CRDTs, it consumes an order of magnitude less memory in the steady state, and loading a document from disk is orders of magnitude faster. Compared to OT, merging long-running branches is orders of magnitude faster. In the worst case, the merging performance of Eg-walker is comparable with existing CRDT algorithms. Eg-walker can be used everywhere CRDTs are used, including peer-to-peer systems without a central server. By offering performance that is competitive with centralised algorithms, our result paves the way towards the widespread adoption of peer-to-peer collaboration software.
Read more9/24/2024
🔄
0
Differentially Processed Optimized Collaborative Rich Text Editor
Nishtha Jatana, Mansehej Singh, Charu Gupta, Geetika Dhand, Shaily Malik, Pankaj Dadheech, Nagender Aneja, Sandhya Aneja
A collaborative real-time text editor is an application that allows multiple users to edit a document simultaneously and merge their contributions automatically. It can be made collaborative by implementing a conflict resolution algorithm either on the client side (in peer-to-peer collaboration) or on the server side (when using web sockets and a central server to monitor state changes). Although web sockets are ideal for real-time text editors, using multiple collaborative editors on one connection can create problems. This is because a single web connection cannot monitor which user is collaborating on which application state, leading to unnecessary network queries and data being delivered to the wrong state. To address this issue, the current solution is to open multiple web socket connections, with one web socket per collaboration application. However, this can add significant overhead proportional to the number of apps utilized. In this study, we demonstrate an algorithm that enables using a single web socket for multiple collaborative applications in a collaborative editor. Our method involves modifying the socket's code to track which application's shared state is being worked on and by whom. This allows for the simultaneous collaboration of multiple states in real-time, with infinite users, without opening a different socket for each application. Our optimized editor showed an efficiency improvement of over 96% in access time duration. This approach can be implemented in other collaborative editors and web applications with similar architecture to improve performance and eliminate issues arising from network overload.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Don't Step on My Toes: Resolving Editing Conflicts in Real-Time Collaboration in Computational Notebooks
April Yi Wang, Zihan Wu, Christopher Brooks, Steve Oney
Real-time collaborative editing in computational notebooks can improve the efficiency of teamwork for data scientists. However, working together through synchronous editing of notebooks introduces new challenges. Data scientists may inadvertently interfere with each others' work by altering the shared codebase and runtime state if they do not set up a social protocol for working together and monitoring their collaborators' progress. In this paper, we propose a real-time collaborative editing model for resolving conflict edits in computational notebooks that introduces three levels of edit protection to help collaborators avoid introducing errors to both the program source code and changes to the runtime state.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Coordination-free Collaborative Replication based on Operational Transformation
Masato Takeichi
We introduce Coordination-free Collaborative Replication (CCR), a new method for maintaining consistency across replicas in distributed systems without requiring explicit coordination messages. CCR automates conflict resolution, contrasting with traditional Data-sharing systems that typically involve centralized update management or predefined consistency rules. Operational Transformation (OT), commonly used in collaborative editing, ensures consistency by transforming operations while maintaining document integrity across replicas. However, OT assumes server-based coordination, which is unsuitable for modern, decentralized Peer-to-Peer (P2P) systems. Conflict-free Replicated Data Type (CRDT), like Two-Phase Sets (2P-Sets), guarantees eventual consistency by allowing commutative and associative operations but often result in counterintuitive behaviors, such as failing to re-add an item to a shopping cart once removed. In contrast, CCR employs a more intuitive approach to replication. It allows for straightforward updates and conflict resolution based on the current data state, enhancing clarity and usability compared to CRDTs. Furthermore, CCR addresses inefficiencies in messaging by developing a versatile protocol based on data stream confluence, thus providing a more efficient and practical solution for collaborative data sharing in distributed systems.
Read more9/17/2024