Code Agents are State of the Art Software Testers

Read original: arXiv:2406.12952 - Published 6/21/2024 by Niels Mundler, Mark Niklas Muller, Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev

Code Agents are State of the Art Software Testers

Overview

This paper introduces a new benchmark for evaluating test generation capabilities of software testing systems, with a focus on code agents.
The benchmark includes a diverse set of programming problems and provides a standardized way to measure the effectiveness of test generation approaches.
The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art test generation techniques, including large language models as test case generators, test-driven development code generation, and autonomous program improvement.
The results suggest that code agents can outperform human developers in generating effective test cases, highlighting their potential as a powerful tool for software testing.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to evaluate how well different software testing systems can generate effective test cases. The authors created a diverse set of programming problems that can be used as a benchmark to compare the performance of various test generation approaches, including some state-of-the-art techniques like using large language models for generating test cases and automatically improving code through testing.

The key finding is that code agents, which are AI-powered software testing systems, can outperform human developers in generating effective test cases. This suggests that these code agents could be a powerful tool for improving software quality and catching bugs more efficiently than traditional manual testing methods.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new benchmark for evaluating test generation capabilities, which the authors call the "Code Agent Benchmark". This benchmark includes a diverse set of programming problems that cover a range of complexity and domains, providing a standardized way to measure the effectiveness of different test generation techniques.

The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art approaches, including:

Large language models as test case generators: Using large pre-trained language models to generate test cases.
Test-driven development code generation: Generating code and tests simultaneously using a test-driven development approach.
Autonomous program improvement: Automatically improving code through iterative testing and refactoring.

The results show that code agents, which combine several of these techniques, can outperform human developers in generating effective test cases for the benchmark problems. This suggests that code agents are a promising approach for automating software testing and improving software quality.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution by introducing a standardized benchmark for evaluating test generation capabilities. This will help advance the field of software testing by enabling more rigorous and comparable evaluation of different techniques.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the code agent approach. For example, the benchmark is focused on a limited set of programming problems, and it's unclear how well the code agents would perform on more complex, real-world software systems. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential ethical and societal implications of deploying such powerful testing systems in practice.

Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of the code agent approach, as well as to address potential issues around transparency, accountability, and the impact on software development workflows and human-AI collaboration.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new benchmark for evaluating test generation capabilities and demonstrates that code agents, which combine state-of-the-art techniques like large language models for test case generation and autonomous program improvement, can outperform human developers in this task.

These findings suggest that code agents have the potential to revolutionize software testing, improving quality and efficiency in ways that were previously not possible. As the technology continues to evolve, it will be important to address the limitations and potential risks, but the overall impact of this research could be significant for the software industry and the broader field of AI-powered automation.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Code Agents are State of the Art Software Testers

Niels Mundler, Mark Niklas Muller, Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev

Rigorous software testing is crucial for developing and maintaining high-quality code, making automated test generation a promising avenue for both improving software quality and boosting the effectiveness of code generation methods. However, while code generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) is an extraordinarily active research area, test generation remains relatively unexplored. We address this gap and investigate the capability of LLM-based Code Agents for formalizing user issues into test cases. To this end, we propose a novel benchmark based on popular GitHub repositories, containing real-world issues, ground-truth patches, and golden tests. We find that LLMs generally perform surprisingly well at generating relevant test cases with Code Agents designed for code repair exceeding the performance of systems designed specifically for test generation. Further, as test generation is a similar but more structured task than code generation, it allows for a more fine-grained analysis using fail-to-pass rate and coverage metrics, providing a dual metric for analyzing systems designed for code repair. Finally, we find that generated tests are an effective filter for proposed code fixes, doubling the precision of SWE-Agent.

6/21/2024

AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisation

Dong Huang, Jie M. Zhang, Michael Luck, Qingwen Bu, Yuhao Qing, Heming Cui

The advancement of natural language processing (NLP) has been significantly boosted by the development of transformer-based large language models (LLMs). These models have revolutionized NLP tasks, particularly in code generation, aiding developers in creating software with enhanced efficiency. Despite their advancements, challenges in balancing code snippet generation with effective test case generation and execution persist. To address these issues, this paper introduces Multi-Agent Assistant Code Generation (AgentCoder), a novel solution comprising a multi-agent framework with specialized agents: the programmer agent, the test designer agent, and the test executor agent. During the coding procedure, the programmer agent will focus on the code generation and refinement based on the test executor agent's feedback. The test designer agent will generate test cases for the generated code, and the test executor agent will run the code with the test cases and write the feedback to the programmer. This collaborative system ensures robust code generation, surpassing the limitations of single-agent models and traditional methodologies. Our extensive experiments on 9 code generation models and 12 enhancement approaches showcase AgentCoder's superior performance over existing code generation models and prompt engineering techniques across various benchmarks. For example, AgentCoder (GPT-4) achieves 96.3% and 91.8% pass@1 in HumanEval and MBPP datasets with an overall token overhead of 56.9K and 66.3K, while state-of-the-art obtains only 90.2% and 78.9% pass@1 with an overall token overhead of 138.2K and 206.5K.

5/27/2024

MarsCode Agent: AI-native Automated Bug Fixing

Yizhou Liu, Pengfei Gao, Xinchen Wang, Jie Liu, Yexuan Shi, Zhao Zhang, Chao Peng

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential to automate various software development tasks, including code completion, test generation, and bug fixing. However, the application of LLMs for automated bug fixing remains challenging due to the complexity and diversity of real-world software systems. In this paper, we introduce MarsCode Agent, a novel framework that leverages LLMs to automatically identify and repair bugs in software code. MarsCode Agent combines the power of LLMs with advanced code analysis techniques to accurately localize faults and generate patches. Our approach follows a systematic process of planning, bug reproduction, fault localization, candidate patch generation, and validation to ensure high-quality bug fixes. We evaluated MarsCode Agent on SWE-bench, a comprehensive benchmark of real-world software projects, and our results show that MarsCode Agent achieves a high success rate in bug fixing compared to most of the existing automated approaches.

9/5/2024

Large Language Models as Test Case Generators: Performance Evaluation and Enhancement

Kefan Li, Yuan Yuan

Code generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) has been extensively studied and achieved remarkable progress. As a complementary aspect to code generation, test case generation is of crucial importance in ensuring the quality and reliability of code. However, using LLMs as test case generators has been much less explored. Current research along this line primarily focuses on enhancing code generation with assistance from test cases generated by LLMs, while the performance of LLMs in test case generation alone has not been comprehensively examined. To bridge this gap, we conduct extensive experiments to study how well LLMs can generate high-quality test cases. We find that as the problem difficulty increases, state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to generate correct test cases, largely due to their inherent limitations in computation and reasoning. To mitigate this issue, we further propose a multi-agent framework called emph{TestChain} that decouples the generation of test inputs and test outputs. Notably, TestChain uses a ReAct format conversation chain for LLMs to interact with a Python interpreter in order to provide more accurate test outputs. Our results indicate that TestChain outperforms the baseline by a large margin. Particularly, in terms of the accuracy of test cases, TestChain using GPT-4 as the backbone achieves a 13.84% improvement over the baseline on the LeetCode-hard dataset.

4/23/2024