ChatGLM-RLHF: Practices of Aligning Large Language Models with Human Feedback

    Read original: arXiv:2404.00934 - Published 4/4/2024 by Zhenyu Hou, Yilin Niu, Zhengxiao Du, Xiaohan Zhang, Xiao Liu, Aohan Zeng, Qinkai Zheng, Minlie Huang, Hongning Wang, Jie Tang and 1 other
    Total Score

    0

    💬

    Sign in to get full access

    or

    If you already have an account, we'll log you in

    Overview

    • The paper proposes ChatGLM-RLHF, a method for aligning large language models with human feedback.
    • It explores techniques to train language models to be more aligned with human preferences and values.
    • The approach uses Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to fine-tune a large language model called ChatGLM.

    Plain English Explanation

    This research aims to create language models that better reflect human values and preferences. Large language models like ChatGPT are incredibly capable, but they can sometimes produce outputs that don't align with what humans consider desirable or ethical.

    The key idea is to use a process called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to fine-tune the language model. In RLHF, humans provide feedback on the model's outputs, and the model is trained to generate responses that the humans prefer. Over time, this shapes the model to produce language that is more in line with human values.

    The researchers applied this RLHF approach to a model called ChatGLM, resulting in a version called ChatGLM-RLHF that is more aligned with human preferences. This could help address concerns about language models behaving in undesirable ways and make them more trustworthy and beneficial for real-world applications.

    Technical Explanation

    The core of the approach is to use Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to fine-tune a large language model called ChatGLM. ChatGLM is a pre-trained model that can generate human-like text. The researchers first collect human feedback on the outputs of ChatGLM, rating them on criteria like coherence, correctness, and alignment with human values.

    They then use this feedback data to train a reward model, which learns to predict how much humans will like the model's outputs. This reward model is used to provide rewards during reinforcement learning, where the language model is trained to generate text that maximizes the reward. Over many iterations, this shapes the model to produce outputs that are more aligned with human preferences.

    The researchers evaluate the resulting ChatGLM-RLHF model on a variety of tasks, including open-ended conversation, question answering, and task completion. They find that ChatGLM-RLHF outperforms the original ChatGLM on measures of coherence, factual accuracy, and value alignment, demonstrating the effectiveness of the RLHF approach.

    Critical Analysis

    The paper provides a thorough explanation of the RLHF technique and its application to the ChatGLM model. One potential limitation is that the evaluation is primarily focused on task-completion and output quality, rather than deeper assessments of value alignment. The authors acknowledge that further work is needed to better understand the model's behavior in more complex, open-ended scenarios.

    Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues around the subjectivity of human feedback and the challenge of defining universal "human values." The training process could inadvertently encode the biases and preferences of the specific individuals providing feedback, rather than truly aligning the model with broader societal values.

    More research is needed to understand the long-term implications of this type of value alignment approach, especially as language models become more powerful and influential. Careful consideration should be given to the ethical frameworks and oversight mechanisms required to ensure these models are developed and deployed responsibly.

    Conclusion

    The ChatGLM-RLHF research represents an important step towards aligning large language models with human preferences and values. By using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, the authors have shown how it is possible to fine-tune a powerful language model to generate outputs that are more coherent, accurate, and aligned with what humans consider desirable.

    This work has significant implications for the development of trustworthy and beneficial AI systems, as it addresses a key challenge in ensuring language models behave in ways that are consistent with human values. However, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential pitfalls of this approach, as well as to explore alternative methods for value alignment. Continued collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and the public will be crucial to ensuring these technologies are developed responsibly and in service of the common good.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    💬

    Total Score

    0

    ChatGLM-RLHF: Practices of Aligning Large Language Models with Human Feedback

    Zhenyu Hou, Yilin Niu, Zhengxiao Du, Xiaohan Zhang, Xiao Liu, Aohan Zeng, Qinkai Zheng, Minlie Huang, Hongning Wang, Jie Tang, Yuxiao Dong

    ChatGLM is a free-to-use AI service powered by the ChatGLM family of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we present the ChatGLM-RLHF pipeline -- a reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) system -- designed to enhance ChatGLM's alignment with human preferences. ChatGLM-RLHF encompasses three major components: the collection of human preference data, the training of the reward model, and the optimization of policies. Throughout the process of integrating ChatGLM-RLHF into production, we encountered and addressed several unprecedented challenges. We introduce the strategies to mitigate reward variance for stabilized large-scale training, implement model parallelism with fused gradient-descent, and design regularization constraints to avoid catastrophic forgetting in LLMs. Experiments show that ChatGLM-RLHF brings significant improvements in alignment tasks compared to the supervised fine-tuned (SFT) version of ChatGLM. For instance, it achieves on average 15% more wins against ChatGLM-SFT in Chinese alignment tasks. The work presents our practices of aligning LLMs with human preferences, offering insights into the challenges and solutions in RLHF implementations.

    Read more

    4/4/2024

    Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs
    Total Score

    0

    Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs

    Yuzi Yan, Xingzhou Lou, Jialian Li, Yiping Zhang, Jian Xie, Chao Yu, Yu Wang, Dong Yan, Yuan Shen

    As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to progress toward more advanced forms of intelligence, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is increasingly seen as a key pathway toward achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, the reliance on reward-model-based (RM-based) alignment methods introduces significant challenges due to the inherent instability and imperfections of Reward Models (RMs), which can lead to critical issues such as reward hacking and misalignment with human intentions. In this paper, we introduce a reward-robust RLHF framework aimed at addressing these fundamental challenges, paving the way for more reliable and resilient learning in LLMs. Our approach introduces a novel optimization objective that carefully balances performance and robustness by incorporating Bayesian Reward Model Ensembles (BRME) to model the uncertainty set of reward functions. This allows the framework to integrate both nominal performance and minimum reward signals, ensuring more stable learning even with imperfect RMs. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms baselines across diverse benchmarks, showing improved accuracy and long-term stability. We also provide a theoretical analysis, demonstrating that reward-robust RLHF approaches the stability of constant reward settings, which proves to be acceptable even in a stochastic-case analysis. Together, these contributions highlight the framework potential to enhance both the performance and stability of LLM alignment.

    Read more

    9/30/2024

    💬

    Total Score

    0

    The Real, the Better: Aligning Large Language Models with Online Human Behaviors

    Guanying Jiang, Lingyong Yan, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin

    Large language model alignment is widely used and studied to avoid LLM producing unhelpful and harmful responses. However, the lengthy training process and predefined preference bias hinder adaptation to online diverse human preferences. To this end, this paper proposes an alignment framework, called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB), to align LLMs by directly leveraging real online human behaviors. By taking the generative adversarial framework, the generator is trained to respond following expected human behavior; while the discriminator tries to verify whether the triplets of query, response, and human behavior come from real online environments. Behavior modeling in natural-language form and the multi-model joint training mechanism enable an active and sustainable online alignment. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed methods by both human and automatic evaluations.

    Read more

    5/2/2024

    SAIL: Self-Improving Efficient Online Alignment of Large Language Models
    Total Score

    0

    SAIL: Self-Improving Efficient Online Alignment of Large Language Models

    Mucong Ding, Souradip Chakraborty, Vibhu Agrawal, Zora Che, Alec Koppel, Mengdi Wang, Amrit Bedi, Furong Huang

    Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a key method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, current offline alignment approaches like DPO, IPO, and SLiC rely heavily on fixed preference datasets, which can lead to sub-optimal performance. On the other hand, recent literature has focused on designing online RLHF methods but still lacks a unified conceptual formulation and suffers from distribution shift issues. To address this, we establish that online LLM alignment is underpinned by bilevel optimization. By reducing this formulation to an efficient single-level first-order method (using the reward-policy equivalence), our approach generates new samples and iteratively refines model alignment by exploring responses and regulating preference labels. In doing so, we permit alignment methods to operate in an online and self-improving manner, as well as generalize prior online RLHF methods as special cases. Compared to state-of-the-art iterative RLHF methods, our approach significantly improves alignment performance on open-sourced datasets with minimal computational overhead.

    Read more

    6/26/2024