# Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems

182

Sign in to get full access

## Overview

- This paper introduces a novel approach called "Chain of Thought" that empowers Transformer models to solve inherently serial problems more effectively.
- The proposed method involves training Transformer models to generate step-by-step reasoning chains, which can then be used to solve complex, multi-step tasks.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a variety of tasks, including mathematical reasoning, program synthesis, and multi-hop question answering.

## Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new technique called "Chain of Thought" that helps Transformer models solve problems that require a sequence of steps or logical reasoning. Many real-world problems, such as solving math problems or answering complex questions, involve multiple steps and can be difficult for AI models to handle.

The key idea behind the Chain of Thought approach is to train the AI model to not just provide a final answer, but to also generate a step-by-step explanation of how it arrived at that answer. This step-by-step "chain of thought" can then be used to improve the model's performance on these types of problems.

For example, when asked to solve a math problem, the model might first explain the underlying mathematical concepts, then show the individual steps it took to arrive at the solution. This detailed reasoning process helps the model better understand the problem and leads to more accurate and reliable solutions.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of the Chain of Thought approach on a variety of tasks, including math reasoning, program synthesis, and multi-hop question answering. They show that models trained with this technique significantly outperform traditional Transformer models on these inherently serial problems.

## Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel approach called "Chain of Thought" that empowers Transformer models to solve inherently serial problems more effectively. The key idea is to train the models to generate step-by-step reasoning chains, which can then be used to solve complex, multi-step tasks.

The authors first provide a detailed overview of decoder-only Transformer architectures and their limitations in solving inherently serial problems. They then describe the Chain of Thought approach, which involves training the models to not only produce a final answer, but also a step-by-step explanation of their reasoning process.

To evaluate the effectiveness of their approach, the authors conduct experiments on a range of tasks, including mathematical reasoning, program synthesis, and multi-hop question answering. They compare the performance of models trained with the Chain of Thought approach to traditional Transformer models and show significant improvements across all the tested domains.

The authors also provide a detailed analysis of the step-by-step reasoning chains generated by their models, revealing insights into the inner workings of Transformer models and their ability to solve complex, multi-step problems.

## Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the performance of Transformer models on inherently serial problems. The authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of their Chain of Thought technique on a diverse set of tasks, suggesting that it could have broad applicability.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the authors do not discuss the computational and memory overhead of generating and processing the step-by-step reasoning chains, which could be a concern for real-world deployment.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the generalizability of the Chain of Thought approach beyond the specific tasks tested. It would be interesting to see how well the technique performs on other types of serial problems or in different domains.

Further research could also investigate the potential for using the step-by-step reasoning chains to improve the interpretability and explainability of Transformer models, which is an important consideration for real-world applications.

## Conclusion

The Chain of Thought approach presented in this paper represents a significant step forward in empowering Transformer models to solve inherently serial problems more effectively. By training the models to generate step-by-step reasoning chains, the authors have demonstrated substantial improvements in tasks like mathematical reasoning, program synthesis, and multi-hop question answering.

The potential implications of this work are far-reaching, as many real-world problems involve complex, multi-step processes that are difficult for traditional AI models to handle. The Chain of Thought technique could pave the way for more capable and reliable Transformer-based systems that can tackle a wide range of complex, serial tasks.

While the paper does not address all the potential limitations or areas for further research, it represents an important contribution to the field of natural language processing and AI reasoning. As the research in this area continues to evolve, the insights and techniques presented in this work are likely to have a lasting impact on the development of more powerful and flexible AI systems.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

## Related Papers

182

### Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems

Zhiyuan Li, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu Ma

Instructing the model to generate a sequence of intermediate steps, a.k.a., a chain of thought (CoT), is a highly effective method to improve the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) on arithmetics and symbolic reasoning tasks. However, the mechanism behind CoT remains unclear. This work provides a theoretical understanding of the power of CoT for decoder-only transformers through the lens of expressiveness. Conceptually, CoT empowers the model with the ability to perform inherently serial computation, which is otherwise lacking in transformers, especially when depth is low. Given input length $n$, previous works have shown that constant-depth transformers with finite precision $mathsf{poly}(n)$ embedding size can only solve problems in $mathsf{TC}^0$ without CoT. We first show an even tighter expressiveness upper bound for constant-depth transformers with constant-bit precision, which can only solve problems in $mathsf{AC}^0$, a proper subset of $ mathsf{TC}^0$. However, with $T$ steps of CoT, constant-depth transformers using constant-bit precision and $O(log n)$ embedding size can solve any problem solvable by boolean circuits of size $T$. Empirically, enabling CoT dramatically improves the accuracy for tasks that are hard for parallel computation, including the composition of permutation groups, iterated squaring, and circuit value problems, especially for low-depth transformers.

Read more9/24/2024

0

### Training Nonlinear Transformers for Chain-of-Thought Inference: A Theoretical Generalization Analysis

Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, Pin-Yu Chen

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is an efficient prompting method that enables the reasoning ability of large language models by augmenting the query using multiple examples with multiple intermediate steps. Despite the empirical success, the theoretical understanding of how to train a Transformer to achieve the CoT ability remains less explored. This is primarily due to the technical challenges involved in analyzing the nonconvex optimization on nonlinear attention models. To the best of our knowledge, this work provides the first theoretical study of training Transformers with nonlinear attention to obtain the CoT generalization capability so that the resulting model can inference on unseen tasks when the input is augmented by examples of the new task. We first quantify the required training samples and iterations to train a Transformer model towards CoT ability. We then prove the success of its CoT generalization on unseen tasks with distribution-shifted testing data. Moreover, we theoretically characterize the conditions for an accurate reasoning output by CoT even when the provided reasoning examples contain noises and are not always accurate. In contrast, in-context learning (ICL), which can be viewed as one-step CoT without intermediate steps, may fail to provide an accurate output when CoT does. These theoretical findings are justified through experiments.

Read more10/8/2024

0

### Autoregressive + Chain of Thought (CoT) $simeq$ Recurrent: Recurrence's Role in Language Models and a Revist of Recurrent Transformer

Xiang Zhang, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan

The Transformer architecture excels in a variety of language modeling tasks, outperforming traditional neural architectures such as RNN and LSTM. This is partially due to its elimination of recurrent connections, which allows for parallel training and a smoother flow of gradients. However, this move away from recurrent structures places the Transformer model at the lower end of Chomsky's computational hierarchy, imposing limitations on its computational abilities. Consequently, even advanced Transformer-based models face considerable difficulties in tasks like counting, string reversal, and multiplication. These tasks, though seemingly elementary, require a level of computational complexity that exceeds the capabilities of the Transformer architecture. Concurrently, the emergence of ``Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting has enabled Transformer-based language models to tackle tasks that were previously impossible or poorly executed. In this work, we thoroughly investigate the influence of recurrent structures in neural models on their reasoning abilities and computability, contrasting the role autoregression plays in the neural models' computational power. We then shed light on how the CoT approach can mimic recurrent computation and act as a bridge between autoregression and recurrence in the context of language models. It is this approximated recurrence that notably improves the model's performance and computational capacity. Moreover, we revisit recent recurrent-based Transformer model designs, focusing on their computational abilities through our proposed concept of ``recurrence-completeness and identify key theoretical limitations in models like Linear Transformer and RWKV. Through this, we aim to provide insight into the neural model architectures and prompt better model design.

Read more9/24/2024

0

### To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning

Zayne Sprague, Fangcong Yin, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Dongwei Jiang, Manya Wadhwa, Prasann Singhal, Xinyu Zhao, Xi Ye, Kyle Mahowald, Greg Durrett

Chain-of-thought (CoT) via prompting is the de facto method for eliciting reasoning capabilities from large language models (LLMs). But for what kinds of tasks is this extra ``thinking'' really helpful? To analyze this, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis covering over 100 papers using CoT and ran our own evaluations of 20 datasets across 14 models. Our results show that CoT gives strong performance benefits primarily on tasks involving math or logic, with much smaller gains on other types of tasks. On MMLU, directly generating the answer without CoT leads to almost identical accuracy as CoT unless the question or model's response contains an equals sign, indicating symbolic operations and reasoning. Following this finding, we analyze the behavior of CoT on these problems by separating planning and execution and comparing against tool-augmented LLMs. Much of CoT's gain comes from improving symbolic execution, but it underperforms relative to using a symbolic solver. Our results indicate that CoT can be applied selectively, maintaining performance while saving inference costs. Furthermore, they suggest a need to move beyond prompt-based CoT to new paradigms that better leverage intermediate computation across the whole range of LLM applications.

Read more9/19/2024