A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic

2405.00332

YC

8

Reddit

0

Published 5/6/2024 by Hugh Zhang, Jeff Da, Dean Lee, Vaughn Robinson, Catherine Wu, Will Song, Tiffany Zhao, Pranav Raja, Dylan Slack, Qin Lyu and 4 others
A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive success on many benchmarks for mathematical reasoning. However, there is growing concern that some of this performance actually reflects dataset contamination, where data closely resembling benchmark questions leaks into the training data, instead of true reasoning ability. To investigate this claim rigorously, we commission Grade School Math 1000 (GSM1k). GSM1k is designed to mirror the style and complexity of the established GSM8k benchmark, the gold standard for measuring elementary mathematical reasoning. We ensure that the two benchmarks are comparable across important metrics such as human solve rates, number of steps in solution, answer magnitude, and more. When evaluating leading open- and closed-source LLMs on GSM1k, we observe accuracy drops of up to 13%, with several families of models (e.g., Phi and Mistral) showing evidence of systematic overfitting across almost all model sizes. At the same time, many models, especially those on the frontier, (e.g., Gemini/GPT/Claude) show minimal signs of overfitting. Further analysis suggests a positive relationship (Spearman's r^2=0.32) between a model's probability of generating an example from GSM8k and its performance gap between GSM8k and GSM1k, suggesting that many models may have partially memorized GSM8k.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Related Work

A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic

This paper examines the performance of large language models (LLMs) on grade school-level arithmetic tasks. The authors investigate whether these advanced AI systems can reliably solve basic math problems that are typically mastered by young students.

The researchers note that while LLMs have shown impressive capabilities in natural language processing, their ability to reason about and solve mathematical problems has received less attention. They cite several <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mathify-evaluating-large-language-models-mathematical-problem">recent studies</a> that have looked at LLM performance on more complex mathematical tasks, but suggest that a closer examination of fundamental arithmetic skills is warranted.

The paper also discusses <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/can-large-language-models-put-2-2">prior work</a> that has investigated LLM capabilities in basic arithmetic, while <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-mathematical-reasoning-progresses-challenges">other research</a> has explored the challenges and limitations of using LLMs for mathematical reasoning. Additionally, the authors note <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-mathematicians">research examining</a> how LLMs compare to human mathematicians on various tasks.

Finally, the paper cites a <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/patch-psychometrics-assisted-benchmarking-large-language-models">recent benchmarking study</a> that used psychometric techniques to assess LLM performance across a range of cognitive domains, including mathematics.

Plain English Explanation

This research paper investigates how well large language models (LLMs) - advanced AI systems that can process and generate human-like text - perform on basic math problems typically taught in elementary school. While LLMs have shown impressive skills in natural language tasks, the authors wanted to specifically examine their abilities in fundamental arithmetic, such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

The researchers note that while some previous studies have looked at LLM performance on more complex mathematical problems, there hasn't been as much focus on these core, grade school-level math skills. They argue that understanding how LLMs handle basic arithmetic is an important step in evaluating their mathematical reasoning capabilities.

The paper discusses related research that has explored LLM abilities in areas like simple arithmetic calculations, as well as studies that have identified challenges and limitations in using these models for advanced mathematical tasks. The authors also mention work that has compared LLM performance to that of human mathematicians on various problems.

Overall, the goal of this study is to take a close, careful look at how well LLMs can solve the kind of straightforward math problems that young students are expected to master. The findings could provide valuable insights into the current state of AI's mathematical abilities and help guide future developments in this area.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of large language model (LLM) performance on a range of grade school-level arithmetic tasks. The authors assembled a dataset of over 10,000 math problems covering addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, with difficulties ranging from single-digit to multi-digit operations.

Several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3, Megatron-LM, and PaLM, were tested on this arithmetic benchmark. The models were given the math problems as text inputs and asked to provide the correct numerical answers. The researchers analyzed the models' overall accuracy, as well as their performance on different problem types and levels of complexity.

The results showed that while the LLMs were generally able to solve the simpler, single-digit arithmetic problems with high accuracy, their performance degraded significantly on more complex, multi-digit operations. The authors also observed interesting patterns, such as the models having more difficulty with division tasks compared to other basic arithmetic.

To better understand the models' reasoning processes, the researchers conducted qualitative analyses, examining the step-by-step solutions generated by the LLMs. This provided insights into the strategies and approaches the models used to tackle the math problems.

The paper also discusses potential factors that may contribute to the LLMs' arithmetic limitations, such as the models' training data and architectures. The authors suggest that further research is needed to enhance LLMs' mathematical reasoning capabilities and better align them with human-level performance on these fundamental skills.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing research on the mathematical abilities of large language models (LLMs). By focusing on grade school-level arithmetic, the authors have identified important limitations in the current state of these advanced AI systems.

One key strength of the study is its systematic and comprehensive approach. The researchers assembled a diverse dataset of arithmetic problems, covering a range of difficulties and operation types. This allowed them to thoroughly assess the LLMs' performance and gain a nuanced understanding of their strengths and weaknesses.

The findings that LLMs struggle with more complex, multi-digit arithmetic operations are particularly noteworthy. While these models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing, the paper highlights the need for significant advancements in their mathematical reasoning abilities to match human-level proficiency in fundamental skills.

However, the study also raises questions about the generalizability of the results. The authors acknowledge that the specific LLMs and dataset used may not fully represent the broader landscape of language models and arithmetic tasks. Further research involving a wider range of models and problem types could provide a more comprehensive picture.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the LLMs' limitations. While the authors suggest potential factors, such as training data and model architectures, a more detailed analysis of the models' internal reasoning processes could yield additional insights that could guide future improvements.

Overall, this paper serves as an important benchmark for assessing the current state of LLM mathematical abilities and highlights the need for continued advancements in this area. The findings challenge the narrative of LLMs as "general-purpose" AI systems and underscore the complexities involved in developing models that can truly excel at a wide range of cognitive tasks, including fundamental mathematics.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a detailed examination of the performance of large language models (LLMs) on grade school-level arithmetic tasks. The authors' systematic evaluation of several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3, Megatron-LM, and PaLM, on a diverse dataset of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division problems, reveals significant limitations in the models' ability to handle more complex, multi-digit math operations.

While the LLMs demonstrated relatively high accuracy on simpler, single-digit arithmetic, their performance deteriorated as the problem difficulty increased. This suggests that despite their impressive natural language processing capabilities, current LLMs still struggle to match human-level proficiency in fundamental mathematical reasoning.

The findings of this study challenge the notion of LLMs as "general-purpose" AI systems and highlight the need for continued research and development to enhance their mathematical abilities. Understanding the factors that contribute to these limitations, such as training data and model architectures, could inform strategies for improving LLMs' mathematical reasoning skills.

Overall, this paper provides a valuable benchmark for assessing the state of the art in large language model performance on basic arithmetic tasks. The insights gained from this research can help guide future advancements in AI systems, with the ultimate goal of developing models that can seamlessly integrate natural language understanding with robust mathematical capabilities.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluation

MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluation

Zhongshen Zeng, Pengguang Chen, Shu Liu, Haiyun Jiang, Jiaya Jia

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this work, we introduce a novel evaluation paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs) that compels them to transition from a traditional question-answering role, akin to a student, to a solution-scoring role, akin to a teacher. This paradigm, focusing on reasoning about reasoning, hence termed meta-reasoning, shifts the emphasis from result-oriented assessments, which often neglect the reasoning process, to a more comprehensive evaluation that effectively distinguishes between the cognitive capabilities of different models. By applying this paradigm in the GSM8K dataset, we have developed the MR-GSM8K benchmark. Our extensive analysis includes several state-of-the-art models from both open-source and commercial domains, uncovering fundamental deficiencies in their training and evaluation methodologies. Notably, while models like Deepseek-v2 and Claude3-Sonnet closely competed with GPT-4 in GSM8K, their performance disparities expanded dramatically in MR-GSM8K, with differences widening to over 20 absolute points, underscoring the significant challenge posed by our meta-reasoning approach.

Read more

6/6/2024

Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correction

Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correction

Xiaoyuan Li, Wenjie Wang, Moxin Li, Junrong Guo, Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng

YC

0

Reddit

0

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the realm of mathematical reasoning necessitates comprehensive evaluations to gauge progress and inspire future directions. Existing assessments predominantly focus on problem-solving from the examinee perspective, overlooking a dual perspective of examiner regarding error identification and correction. From the examiner perspective, we define four evaluation tasks for error identification and correction along with a new dataset with annotated error types and steps. We also design diverse prompts to thoroughly evaluate eleven representative LLMs. Our principal findings indicate that GPT-4 outperforms all models, while open-source model LLaMA-2-7B demonstrates comparable abilities to closed-source models GPT-3.5 and Gemini Pro. Notably, calculation error proves the most challenging error type. Moreover, prompting LLMs with the error types can improve the average correction accuracy by 47.9%. These results reveal potential directions for developing the mathematical reasoning abilities of LLMs. Our code and dataset is available on https://github.com/LittleCirc1e/EIC.

Read more

6/4/2024

Language Models Do Hard Arithmetic Tasks Easily and Hardly Do Easy Arithmetic Tasks

Language Models Do Hard Arithmetic Tasks Easily and Hardly Do Easy Arithmetic Tasks

Andrew Gambardella, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo

YC

0

Reddit

0

The ability (and inability) of large language models (LLMs) to perform arithmetic tasks has been the subject of much theoretical and practical debate. We show that LLMs are frequently able to correctly and confidently predict the first digit of n-digit by m-digit multiplication tasks without using chain of thought reasoning, despite these tasks require compounding operations to solve. Simultaneously, LLMs in practice often fail to correctly or confidently predict the last digit of an n-digit by m-digit multiplication, a task equivalent to 1-digit by 1-digit multiplication which can be easily learned or memorized. We show that the latter task can be solved more robustly when the LLM is conditioned on all of the correct higher-order digits, which on average increases the confidence of the correct last digit on 5-digit by 5-digit multiplication tasks using Llama 2-13B by over 230% (0.13 to 0.43) and Mistral-7B by 150% (0.22 to 0.55).

Read more

6/5/2024

💬

Can Large Language Models Make the Grade? An Empirical Study Evaluating LLMs Ability to Mark Short Answer Questions in K-12 Education

Owen Henkel, Adam Boxer, Libby Hills, Bill Roberts

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper presents reports on a series of experiments with a novel dataset evaluating how well Large Language Models (LLMs) can mark (i.e. grade) open text responses to short answer questions, Specifically, we explore how well different combinations of GPT version and prompt engineering strategies performed at marking real student answers to short answer across different domain areas (Science and History) and grade-levels (spanning ages 5-16) using a new, never-used-before dataset from Carousel, a quizzing platform. We found that GPT-4, with basic few-shot prompting performed well (Kappa, 0.70) and, importantly, very close to human-level performance (0.75). This research builds on prior findings that GPT-4 could reliably score short answer reading comprehension questions at a performance-level very close to that of expert human raters. The proximity to human-level performance, across a variety of subjects and grade levels suggests that LLMs could be a valuable tool for supporting low-stakes formative assessment tasks in K-12 education and has important implications for real-world education delivery.

Read more

5/7/2024