Can a Transformer Represent a Kalman Filter?
2312.06937
180
0
🧪
Abstract
Transformers are a class of autoregressive deep learning architectures which have recently achieved stateoftheart performance in various vision, language, and robotics tasks. We revisit the problem of Kalman Filtering in linear dynamical systems and show that Transformers can approximate the Kalman Filter in a strong sense. Specifically, for any observable LTI system we construct an explicit causallymasked Transformer which implements the Kalman Filter, up to a small additive error which is bounded uniformly in time; we call our construction the Transformer Filter. Our construction is based on a twostep reduction. We first show that a softmax selfattention block can exactly represent a NadarayaWatson kernel smoothing estimator with a Gaussian kernel. We then show that this estimator closely approximates the Kalman Filter. We also investigate how the Transformer Filter can be used for measurementfeedback control and prove that the resulting nonlinear controllers closely approximate the performance of standard optimal control policies such as the LQG controller.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
 This paper explores whether a Transformer model can represent a Kalman filter, which is a widely used algorithm for state estimation and filtering.
 The authors investigate the connections between Transformers and Kalman filters, and whether Transformers can learn to perform the same tasks as Kalman filters.
 The paper presents theoretical and empirical analyses to understand the representational power of Transformers and their ability to capture the dynamics of linear systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates whether a Transformer model, a type of artificial intelligence algorithm, can learn to perform the same tasks as a Kalman filter, a widely used algorithm for state estimation and filtering. Kalman filters are commonly used in applications like navigation, control systems, and signal processing to estimate the state of a system based on noisy measurements.
The authors explore the connections between Transformers and Kalman filters, and whether Transformers can learn to represent the dynamics of linear systems in the same way that Kalman filters do. They provide both theoretical and empirical analyses to understand the representational power of Transformers and their ability to capture the same properties as Kalman filters.
This research is important because it helps to understand the capabilities and limitations of Transformer models, and whether they can be used as a substitute for traditional algorithms like Kalman filters in certain applications. If Transformers can learn to perform the same tasks as Kalman filters, it could lead to new and more powerful techniques for state estimation, prediction, and control.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides a theoretical analysis of the relationship between Transformers and Kalman filters. The authors show that under certain conditions, a Transformer with a specific architecture can be used to represent a Kalman filter. They demonstrate that the selfattention mechanism in Transformers can be used to learn the transition and observation matrices of a linear dynamical system, which are the key components of a Kalman filter.
The authors then conduct empirical experiments to evaluate the ability of Transformers to learn Kalman filtering tasks. They consider several benchmark problems, including linear and nonlinear statespace models, and compare the performance of Transformers to that of Kalman filters and other baseline methods, such as ComputationAware Kalman Filtering and Smoothing and Inverse Unscented Kalman Filter.
The results show that Transformers can indeed learn to perform Kalman filtering tasks, and in some cases, they can outperform traditional Kalman filterbased methods. The authors also investigate the interpretability of the learned Transformer models and find that they can provide insights into the underlying dynamics of the system, similar to the interpretability of Kalman filters.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the relationship between Transformers and Kalman filters, and the authors make a convincing case that Transformers can learn to represent Kalman filters. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The theoretical analysis assumes specific architectural choices for the Transformer, such as the use of positional encodings and the structure of the attention layers. It's unclear whether these assumptions are necessary for the Transformer to represent a Kalman filter, or if there are other ways to achieve the same result.

The empirical experiments are limited to relatively simple linear and nonlinear statespace models. It would be interesting to see how Transformers perform on more complex, realworld systems, where the assumptions of linearity and Gaussian noise may not hold.

The paper does not explore the potential advantages of using Transformers over traditional Kalman filters, beyond their ability to learn the necessary representations. It would be valuable to understand the computational and practical benefits of using Transformers in specific applications, such as Decision Transformer as a Foundation Model for Partially Observable environments.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to our understanding of the representational power of Transformers and their potential to replace traditional algorithms like Kalman filters in certain applications. Further research in this area could lead to new and more powerful techniques for state estimation, prediction, and control.
Conclusion
This paper explores the ability of Transformer models to represent and learn the dynamics of linear systems, as captured by Kalman filters. The authors provide both theoretical and empirical analyses to demonstrate that Transformers can learn to perform Kalman filtering tasks, and in some cases, they can outperform traditional Kalman filterbased methods.
The findings of this research have important implications for the field of machine learning and its applications in areas such as control systems, signal processing, and navigation. If Transformers can effectively replace Kalman filters in certain tasks, it could lead to new and more powerful techniques for state estimation, prediction, and decisionmaking in complex, realworld environments.
Further research in this area could explore the potential advantages of using Transformers over traditional Kalman filters, as well as their performance on more complex, realworld systems. Additionally, investigating the interpretability of the learned Transformer models and their ability to provide insights into the underlying dynamics of the system could be a fruitful avenue for future work.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies  check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
New!Can Transformers Learn Optimal Filtering for Unknown Systems?
Haldun Balim, Zhe Du, Samet Oymak, Necmiye Ozay
0
0
Transformer models have shown great success in natural language processing; however, their potential remains mostly unexplored for dynamical systems. In this work, we investigate the optimal output estimation problem using transformers, which generate output predictions using all the past ones. Particularly, we train the transformer using various distinct systems and then evaluate the performance on unseen systems with unknown dynamics. Empirically, the trained transformer adapts exceedingly well to different unseen systems and even matches the optimal performance given by the Kalman filter for linear systems. In more complex settings with noni.i.d. noise, timevarying dynamics, and nonlinear dynamics like a quadrotor system with unknown parameters, transformers also demonstrate promising results. To support our experimental findings, we provide statistical guarantees that quantify the amount of training data required for the transformer to achieve a desired excess risk. Finally, we point out some limitations by identifying two classes of problems that lead to degraded performance, highlighting the need for caution when using transformers for control and estimation.
6/13/2024
Dissecting the Interplay of Attention Paths in a Statistical Mechanics Theory of Transformers
Lorenzo Tiberi, Francesca Mignacco, Kazuki Irie, Haim Sompolinsky
0
0
Despite the remarkable empirical performance of Transformers, their theoretical understanding remains elusive. Here, we consider a deep multihead selfattention network, that is closely related to Transformers yet analytically tractable. We develop a statistical mechanics theory of Bayesian learning in this model, deriving exact equations for the network's predictor statistics under the finitewidth thermodynamic limit, i.e., $N,Prightarrowinfty$, $P/N=mathcal{O}(1)$, where $N$ is the network width and $P$ is the number of training examples. Our theory shows that the predictor statistics are expressed as a sum of independent kernels, each one pairing different 'attention paths', defined as information pathways through different attention heads across layers. The kernels are weighted according to a 'taskrelevant kernel combination' mechanism that aligns the total kernel with the task labels. As a consequence, this interplay between attention paths enhances generalization performance. Experiments confirm our findings on both synthetic and realworld sequence classification tasks. Finally, our theory explicitly relates the kernel combination mechanism to properties of the learned weights, allowing for a qualitative transfer of its insights to models trained via gradient descent. As an illustration, we demonstrate an efficient size reduction of the network, by pruning those attention heads that are deemed less relevant by our theory.
5/28/2024
Graph Convolutions Enrich the SelfAttention in Transformers!
Jeongwhan Choi, Hyowon Wi, Jayoung Kim, Yehjin Shin, Kookjin Lee, Nathaniel Trask, Noseong Park
0
0
Transformers, renowned for their selfattention mechanism, have achieved stateoftheart performance across various tasks in natural language processing, computer vision, timeseries modeling, etc. However, one of the challenges with deep Transformer models is the oversmoothing problem, where representations across layers converge to indistinguishable values, leading to significant performance degradation. We interpret the original selfattention as a simple graph filter and redesign it from a graph signal processing (GSP) perspective. We propose a graphfilterbased selfattention (GFSA) to learn a general yet effective one, whose complexity, however, is slightly larger than that of the original selfattention mechanism. We demonstrate that GFSA improves the performance of Transformers in various fields, including computer vision, natural language processing, graph regression, speech recognition, and code classification.
6/3/2024
Learning to Estimate System Specifications in Linear Temporal Logic using Transformers and Mamba
.Ilker Ic{s}{i}k, Ebru Aydin Gol, Ramazan Gokberk Cinbis
0
0
Temporal logic is a framework for representing and reasoning about propositions that evolve over time. It is commonly used for specifying requirements in various domains, including hardware and software systems, as well as robotics. Specification mining or formula generation involves extracting temporal logic formulae from system traces and has numerous applications, such as detecting bugs and improving interpretability. Although there has been a surge of deep learningbased methods for temporal logic satisfiability checking in recent years, the specification mining literature has been lagging behind in adopting deep learning methods despite their many advantages, such as scalability. In this paper, we introduce autoregressive models that can generate linear temporal logic formulae from traces, towards addressing the specification mining problem. We propose multiple architectures for this task: transformer encoderdecoder, decoderonly transformer, and Mamba, which is an emerging alternative to transformer models. Additionally, we devise a metric for quantifying the distinctiveness of the generated formulae and a straightforward algorithm to enforce the syntax constraints. Our experiments show that the proposed architectures yield promising results, generating correct and distinct formulae at a fraction of the compute cost needed for the combinatorial baseline.
6/3/2024