Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More?

    Read original: arXiv:2406.13121 - Published 6/21/2024 by Jinhyuk Lee, Anthony Chen, Zhuyun Dai, Dheeru Dua, Devendra Singh Sachan, Michael Boratko, Yi Luan, S'ebastien M. R. Arnold, Vincent Perot, Siddharth Dalmia and 9 others
    Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More?

    Overview

    • Introduces a new long-context language model benchmark called LOFT, with documents up to 1 million tokens long
    • Explores whether large language models can handle tasks traditionally handled by specialized systems like information retrieval, question-answering, and SQL databases
    • Presents experiments showing that long-context language models can perform well on these tasks, potentially subsuming the need for separate systems

    Plain English Explanation

    This paper explores whether large language models - AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data - can handle a variety of tasks that have traditionally required specialized systems. The researchers introduce a new benchmark called LOFT, which tests how well these models can work with extremely long documents, up to 1 million tokens (a token is roughly equivalent to a word).

    The key idea is that if language models can perform well on tasks like information retrieval, question-answering, and interacting with databases - without needing separate specialized systems - it could lead to more streamlined and powerful AI assistants. Previous research has suggested that long-context language models may struggle with long-form tasks, so this paper tests whether that limitation can be overcome.

    Through their experiments, the researchers found that large language models can indeed handle these tasks effectively, potentially making separate retrieval, QA, and database systems unnecessary. This could simplify AI architectures and enable more seamless integration of different capabilities.

    Technical Explanation

    The paper introduces the LOFT (Long-Form Task) benchmark, which includes documents up to 1 million tokens long across a variety of domains like news, Wikipedia, and web pages. The goal is to test whether language models can perform well on tasks that traditionally required separate components, like information retrieval, question-answering, and interacting with SQL databases.

    The researchers trained large language models on the LOFT dataset and evaluated them on these various tasks. For information retrieval, they tested the models' ability to find relevant passages given a query. For question-answering, they assessed how well the models could answer questions based on the long-form content. And for the SQL task, they evaluated the models' ability to generate SQL queries to retrieve specific information from a database.

    The results showed that the language models were able to perform competitively with or even outperform specialized systems on these tasks. This suggests that a single long-context language model may be able to subsume the functionality of multiple separate components, potentially leading to more unified and capable AI systems.

    Critical Analysis

    The paper makes a compelling case that large language models can handle a diverse range of tasks that have traditionally required specialized systems. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations of their approach. For example, the SQL task was relatively simple, and more complex database interactions may still require dedicated components.

    Additionally, while the language models performed well on average, there was significant variability in their performance across different samples and tasks. This suggests that further refinements may be needed to make them consistently reliable.

    The researchers also note that their experiments focused on the language models' raw capabilities, without considering practical deployment factors like computational cost, model size, and training data requirements. These real-world constraints may affect the feasibility of fully subsuming multiple systems into a single language model.

    Overall, the paper provides promising evidence that long-context language models can be highly versatile, but more research is needed to fully assess the tradeoffs and limitations of this approach compared to maintaining separate specialized systems.

    Conclusion

    This paper introduces a new benchmark called LOFT that tests the ability of large language models to handle tasks traditionally requiring specialized systems. The results suggest that these models can perform competitively on information retrieval, question-answering, and SQL tasks, potentially enabling more unified and capable AI assistants in the future.

    While further refinements may be needed, the findings highlight the remarkable flexibility of modern language models and their potential to subsume a wide range of functionalities. As the field of AI continues to evolve, this research points to exciting possibilities for simplifying system architectures and unlocking new levels of integration and performance.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Total Score

    0

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More?
    Total Score

    0

    Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More?

    Jinhyuk Lee, Anthony Chen, Zhuyun Dai, Dheeru Dua, Devendra Singh Sachan, Michael Boratko, Yi Luan, S'ebastien M. R. Arnold, Vincent Perot, Siddharth Dalmia, Hexiang Hu, Xudong Lin, Panupong Pasupat, Aida Amini, Jeremy R. Cole, Sebastian Riedel, Iftekhar Naim, Ming-Wei Chang, Kelvin Guu

    Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. Leveraging LCLMs' ability to natively ingest and process entire corpora of information offers numerous advantages. It enhances user-friendliness by eliminating the need for specialized knowledge of tools, provides robust end-to-end modeling that minimizes cascading errors in complex pipelines, and allows for the application of sophisticated prompting techniques across the entire system. To assess this paradigm shift, we introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks. However, LCLMs still face challenges in areas like compositional reasoning that are required in SQL-like tasks. Notably, prompting strategies significantly influence performance, emphasizing the need for continued research as context lengths grow. Overall, LOFT provides a rigorous testing ground for LCLMs, showcasing their potential to supplant existing paradigms and tackle novel tasks as model capabilities scale.

    Read more

    6/21/2024

    💬

    Total Score

    0

    LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?

    Jiaqi Li, Mengmeng Wang, Zilong Zheng, Muhan Zhang

    Large language models (LLMs), despite their impressive performance in various language tasks, are typically limited to processing texts within context-window size. This limitation has spurred significant research efforts to enhance LLMs' long-context understanding with high-quality long-sequence benchmarks. However, prior datasets in this regard suffer from shortcomings, such as short context length compared to the context window of modern LLMs; outdated documents that have data leakage problems; and an emphasis on short dependency tasks rather than long dependency tasks. In this paper, we present LooGLE, a Long Context Generic Language Evaluation benchmark for LLMs' long context understanding. LooGLE features relatively new documents post-2022, with over 24,000 tokens per document and 6,000 newly generated questions spanning diverse domains. Human annotators meticulously crafted more than 1,100 high-quality question-answer pairs to meet the long dependency requirements. These pairs underwent thorough cross-validation, yielding the most precise assessment of LLMs' long dependency capabilities. The evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs on LooGLE revealed key findings: (i) commercial models outperformed open-sourced models; (ii) LLMs excelled in short dependency tasks like short question-answering and cloze tasks but struggled with more intricate long dependency tasks; (iii) in-context learning and chaining thoughts offered only marginal improvements; (iv) retrieval-based techniques demonstrated substantial benefits for short question-answering, while strategies for extending context window length had limited impact on long context understanding. As such, LooGLE not only provides a systematic and comprehensive evaluation schema on long-context LLMs, but also sheds light on future development of enhanced models towards true long-context understanding.

    Read more

    9/9/2024

    Holistic Reasoning with Long-Context LMs: A Benchmark for Database Operations on Massive Textual Data
    Total Score

    0

    Holistic Reasoning with Long-Context LMs: A Benchmark for Database Operations on Massive Textual Data

    Seiji Maekawa, Hayate Iso, Nikita Bhutani

    The rapid increase in textual information means we need more efficient methods to sift through, organize, and understand it all. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models excel in accessing information from large document collections, they struggle with complex tasks that require aggregation and reasoning over information spanning across multiple documents--what we call holistic reasoning. Long-context language models (LCLMs) have great potential for managing large-scale documents, but their holistic reasoning capabilities remain unclear. In this work, we introduce HoloBench, a novel framework that brings database reasoning operations into text-based contexts, making it easier to systematically evaluate how LCLMs handle holistic reasoning across large documents. Our approach adjusts key factors such as context length, information density, distribution of information, and query complexity to evaluate LCLMs comprehensively. Our experiments show that the amount of information in the context has a bigger influence on LCLM performance than the actual context length. Furthermore, the complexity of queries affects performance more than the amount of information, particularly for different types of queries. Interestingly, queries that involve finding maximum or minimum values are easier for LCLMs and are less affected by context length, even though they pose challenges for RAG systems. However, tasks requiring the aggregation of multiple pieces of information show a noticeable drop in accuracy as context length increases. Additionally, we find that while grouping relevant information generally improves performance, the optimal positioning varies across models. Our findings surface both the advancements and the ongoing challenges in achieving a holistic understanding of long contexts.

    Read more

    10/17/2024

    NeedleBench: Can LLMs Do Retrieval and Reasoning in 1 Million Context Window?
    Total Score

    0

    NeedleBench: Can LLMs Do Retrieval and Reasoning in 1 Million Context Window?

    Mo Li, Songyang Zhang, Yunxin Liu, Kai Chen

    In evaluating the long-context capabilities of large language models (LLMs), identifying content relevant to a user's query from original long documents is a crucial prerequisite for any LLM to answer questions based on long text. We present NeedleBench, a framework consisting of a series of progressively more challenging tasks for assessing bilingual long-context capabilities, spanning multiple length intervals (4k, 8k, 32k, 128k, 200k, 1000k, and beyond) and different depth ranges, allowing the strategic insertion of critical data points in different text depth zones to rigorously test the retrieval and reasoning capabilities of models in diverse contexts. We use the NeedleBench framework to assess how well the leading open-source models can identify key information relevant to the question and apply that information to reasoning in bilingual long texts. Furthermore, we propose the Ancestral Trace Challenge (ATC) to mimic the complexity of logical reasoning challenges that are likely to be present in real-world long-context tasks, providing a simple method for evaluating LLMs in dealing with complex long-context situations. Our results suggest that current LLMs have significant room for improvement in practical long-context applications, as they struggle with the complexity of logical reasoning challenges that are likely to be present in real-world long-context tasks. All codes and resources are available at OpenCompass: https://github.com/open-compass/opencompass.

    Read more

    7/17/2024