Bot or Human? Detecting ChatGPT Imposters with A Single Question

2305.06424

YC

39

Reddit

1

Published 4/23/2024 by Hong Wang, Xuan Luo, Weizhi Wang, Xifeng Yan

🔗

Abstract

Large language models like GPT-4 have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, enabling various applications including translation, essay writing, and chit-chatting. However, there is a concern that they can be misused for malicious purposes, such as fraud or denial-of-service attacks. Therefore, it is crucial to develop methods for detecting whether the party involved in a conversation is a bot or a human. In this paper, we propose a framework named FLAIR, Finding Large Language Model Authenticity via a Single Inquiry and Response, to detect conversational bots in an online manner. Specifically, we target a single question scenario that can effectively differentiate human users from bots. The questions are divided into two categories: those that are easy for humans but difficult for bots (e.g., counting, substitution, and ASCII art reasoning), and those that are easy for bots but difficult for humans (e.g., memorization and computation). Our approach shows different strengths of these questions in their effectiveness, providing a new way for online service providers to protect themselves against nefarious activities and ensure that they are serving real users. We open-sourced our code and dataset on https://github.com/hongwang600/FLAIR and welcome contributions from the community.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • Large language models like GPT-4 have impressive capabilities in natural language processing, enabling various applications.
  • However, there is a concern that they can be misused for malicious purposes, such as fraud or denial-of-service attacks.
  • It is crucial to develop methods for detecting whether the party involved in a conversation is a bot or a human.
  • The paper proposes a framework named FLAIR (Finding Large Language Model Authenticity via a Single Inquiry and Response) to detect conversational bots in an online manner.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the growing capabilities of large language models like GPT-4, which can now perform tasks like translation, essay writing, and chit-chatting. While these models have many beneficial applications, there is a concern that they could also be misused for malicious purposes, such as generating fake news or launching denial-of-service attacks.

To address this issue, the researchers propose a framework called FLAIR, which stands for "Finding Large Language Model Authenticity via a Single Inquiry and Response." The goal of FLAIR is to detect whether the person you're conversing with online is a human or a bot. The key idea is to ask a series of questions that are easy for humans to answer but difficult for bots, and vice versa. This allows the system to differentiate between real users and malicious bots.

For example, the "easy for humans, hard for bots" questions might involve things like counting, substitution, or reasoning about ASCII art. The "easy for bots, hard for humans" questions might focus on memorization or computation. By analyzing the responses to these types of questions, the FLAIR system can determine whether it's talking to a human or a bot.

The researchers have open-sourced their code and dataset, and they welcome contributions from the community to further develop and refine the FLAIR approach. This work provides a new way for online service providers to protect themselves against nefarious activities and ensure they are serving real users.

Technical Explanation

The FLAIR framework targets a single-question scenario to effectively differentiate human users from bots. The questions are divided into two categories:

  1. Easy for humans but difficult for bots (e.g., counting, substitution, and ASCII art reasoning)
  2. Easy for bots but difficult for humans (e.g., memorization and computation)

By analyzing the responses to these different types of questions, the FLAIR system can determine whether it is interacting with a human or a bot. The researchers have open-sourced their code and dataset on GitHub, inviting the community to contribute and further develop the FLAIR approach.

The key elements of the FLAIR framework include:

  • Question design: Categorizing questions based on their difficulty for humans vs. bots
  • Response analysis: Evaluating the responses to identify patterns that distinguish humans from bots
  • Online detection: Implementing the framework in a real-time, conversational setting to detect bot activity

The insights from this research provide a new way for online service providers to protect against malicious activities and ensure they are serving real users.

Critical Analysis

The FLAIR framework presents a promising approach to addressing the potential misuse of large language models. By leveraging a single-question scenario to differentiate humans from bots, the researchers have demonstrated a practical and scalable solution.

However, it's important to note that the effectiveness of the FLAIR framework may be limited in scenarios where bots become more advanced and can respond to a wider range of question types. Additionally, the reliance on specific question categories could be vulnerable to adaptive strategies developed by malicious actors.

Further research could explore the resilience of the FLAIR approach against more sophisticated bot techniques, as well as the potential for incorporating additional signals or context to improve the accuracy of bot detection. Exploring the long-term viability of the framework as language models continue to evolve would also be valuable.

Conclusion

The paper presents the FLAIR framework as a novel approach to detecting conversational bots in an online setting. By leveraging a single-question scenario that exploits the differences between human and bot responses, FLAIR provides a practical solution for online service providers to protect against malicious activities and ensure they are serving real users.

The open-sourcing of the FLAIR code and dataset encourages community involvement and further development of this important research. As large language models continue to advance, the need for effective bot detection mechanisms will only grow, making the FLAIR framework a valuable contribution to this critical area of study.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations

A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations

Morgan Sandler, Hyesun Choung, Arun Ross, Prabu David

YC

0

Reddit

0

This study explores linguistic differences between human and LLM-generated dialogues, using 19.5K dialogues generated by ChatGPT-3.5 as a companion to the EmpathicDialogues dataset. The research employs Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis, comparing ChatGPT-generated conversations with human conversations across 118 linguistic categories. Results show greater variability and authenticity in human dialogues, but ChatGPT excels in categories such as social processes, analytical style, cognition, attentional focus, and positive emotional tone, reinforcing recent findings of LLMs being more human than human. However, no significant difference was found in positive or negative affect between ChatGPT and human dialogues. Classifier analysis of dialogue embeddings indicates implicit coding of the valence of affect despite no explicit mention of affect in the conversations. The research also contributes a novel, companion ChatGPT-generated dataset of conversations between two independent chatbots, which were designed to replicate a corpus of human conversations available for open access and used widely in AI research on language modeling. Our findings enhance understanding of ChatGPT's linguistic capabilities and inform ongoing efforts to distinguish between human and LLM-generated text, which is critical in detecting AI-generated fakes, misinformation, and disinformation.

Read more

4/29/2024

💬

New!Large Language Models Can Infer Personality from Free-Form User Interactions

Heinrich Peters, Moran Cerf, Sandra C. Matz

YC

0

Reddit

0

This study investigates the capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) to infer the Big Five personality traits from free-form user interactions. The results demonstrate that a chatbot powered by GPT-4 can infer personality with moderate accuracy, outperforming previous approaches drawing inferences from static text content. The accuracy of inferences varied across different conversational settings. Performance was highest when the chatbot was prompted to elicit personality-relevant information from users (mean r=.443, range=[.245, .640]), followed by a condition placing greater emphasis on naturalistic interaction (mean r=.218, range=[.066, .373]). Notably, the direct focus on personality assessment did not result in a less positive user experience, with participants reporting the interactions to be equally natural, pleasant, engaging, and humanlike across both conditions. A chatbot mimicking ChatGPT's default behavior of acting as a helpful assistant led to markedly inferior personality inferences and lower user experience ratings but still captured psychologically meaningful information for some of the personality traits (mean r=.117, range=[-.004, .209]). Preliminary analyses suggest that the accuracy of personality inferences varies only marginally across different socio-demographic subgroups. Our results highlight the potential of LLMs for psychological profiling based on conversational interactions. We discuss practical implications and ethical challenges associated with these findings.

Read more

5/24/2024

Evaluation of LLM Chatbots for OSINT-based Cyber Threat Awareness

Evaluation of LLM Chatbots for OSINT-based Cyber Threat Awareness

Samaneh Shafee, Alysson Bessani, Pedro M. Ferreira

YC

0

Reddit

0

Knowledge sharing about emerging threats is crucial in the rapidly advancing field of cybersecurity and forms the foundation of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI). In this context, Large Language Models are becoming increasingly significant in the field of cybersecurity, presenting a wide range of opportunities. This study surveys the performance of ChatGPT, GPT4all, Dolly, Stanford Alpaca, Alpaca-LoRA, Falcon, and Vicuna chatbots in binary classification and Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks performed using Open Source INTelligence (OSINT). We utilize well-established data collected in previous research from Twitter to assess the competitiveness of these chatbots when compared to specialized models trained for those tasks. In binary classification experiments, Chatbot GPT-4 as a commercial model achieved an acceptable F1 score of 0.94, and the open-source GPT4all model achieved an F1 score of 0.90. However, concerning cybersecurity entity recognition, all evaluated chatbots have limitations and are less effective. This study demonstrates the capability of chatbots for OSINT binary classification and shows that they require further improvement in NER to effectively replace specially trained models. Our results shed light on the limitations of the LLM chatbots when compared to specialized models, and can help researchers improve chatbots technology with the objective to reduce the required effort to integrate machine learning in OSINT-based CTI tools.

Read more

4/22/2024

🔎

FakeGPT: Fake News Generation, Explanation and Detection of Large Language Models

Yue Huang, Lichao Sun

YC

0

Reddit

0

The rampant spread of fake news has adversely affected society, resulting in extensive research on curbing its spread. As a notable milestone in large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT has gained significant attention due to its exceptional natural language processing capabilities. In this study, we present a thorough exploration of ChatGPT's proficiency in generating, explaining, and detecting fake news as follows. Generation -- We employ four prompt methods to generate fake news samples and prove the high quality of these samples through both self-assessment and human evaluation. Explanation -- We obtain nine features to characterize fake news based on ChatGPT's explanations and analyze the distribution of these factors across multiple public datasets. Detection -- We examine ChatGPT's capacity to identify fake news. We explore its detection consistency and then propose a reason-aware prompt method to improve its performance. Although our experiments demonstrate that ChatGPT shows commendable performance in detecting fake news, there is still room for its improvement. Consequently, we further probe into the potential extra information that could bolster its effectiveness in detecting fake news.

Read more

4/9/2024