Get a weekly rundown of the latest AI models and research... subscribe! https://aimodels.substack.com/

Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Audits

2401.14446

YC

2

Reddit

0

Published 5/14/2024 by Stephen Casper, Carson Ezell, Charlotte Siegmann, Noam Kolt, Taylor Lynn Curtis, Benjamin Bucknall, Andreas Haupt, Kevin Wei, J'er'emy Scheurer, Marius Hobbhahn and 11 others
Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Audits

Abstract

External audits of AI systems are increasingly recognized as a key mechanism for AI governance. The effectiveness of an audit, however, depends on the degree of access granted to auditors. Recent audits of state-of-the-art AI systems have primarily relied on black-box access, in which auditors can only query the system and observe its outputs. However, white-box access to the system's inner workings (e.g., weights, activations, gradients) allows an auditor to perform stronger attacks, more thoroughly interpret models, and conduct fine-tuning. Meanwhile, outside-the-box access to training and deployment information (e.g., methodology, code, documentation, data, deployment details, findings from internal evaluations) allows auditors to scrutinize the development process and design more targeted evaluations. In this paper, we examine the limitations of black-box audits and the advantages of white- and outside-the-box audits. We also discuss technical, physical, and legal safeguards for performing these audits with minimal security risks. Given that different forms of access can lead to very different levels of evaluation, we conclude that (1) transparency regarding the access and methods used by auditors is necessary to properly interpret audit results, and (2) white- and outside-the-box access allow for substantially more scrutiny than black-box access alone.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper argues that black-box access to AI systems is not enough for rigorous auditing and evaluation, and that additional transparency and explainability measures are needed.
  • The authors discuss the limitations of black-box access, the importance of white-box access and interpretability, the challenges of adversarial attacks, and the need for standardized auditing frameworks.
  • They propose several solutions, including the development of "trustless audits" that allow for auditing without revealing sensitive data or model details, as well as approaches for Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations and Gradient-Like Explanations Under Black-Box Setting.

Plain English Explanation

The paper argues that simply being able to test an AI system from the outside, without knowing how it works internally, is not enough to properly audit and evaluate it. The authors believe that having full access to the AI model's inner workings, as well as the ability to interpret and explain its decision-making process, is crucial for rigorous auditing.

One key issue they discuss is the threat of adversarial attacks, where small tweaks to the input can cause the AI to behave in unexpected and potentially harmful ways. They suggest that understanding the model's inner logic is necessary to defend against such attacks.

The paper proposes several solutions to address these challenges. One idea is to develop "trustless audits" that allow third-parties to audit an AI system without needing to see the sensitive data or model details. Another approach is to use techniques like Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations and Gradient-Like Explanations Under Black-Box Setting to better understand how the AI model is making its decisions, even if the full inner workings are not accessible.

The key message is that transparency and explainability are critical for responsible AI development and deployment, and that black-box access alone is insufficient for thorough auditing and evaluation.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the limitations of black-box access to AI systems, arguing that it is not enough for rigorous auditing and evaluation. The authors discuss how black-box access restricts the ability to investigate potential issues like adversarial attacks, which can cause AI systems to behave unexpectedly or maliciously.

To address these limitations, the authors propose the concept of "white-box access", which would provide deeper visibility into the AI model's internal structure and decision-making processes. They suggest that techniques like Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations and Gradient-Like Explanations Under Black-Box Setting could help achieve this level of interpretability, even when the full model details are not accessible.

Additionally, the paper discusses the need for standardized auditing frameworks and the challenges of balancing transparency with the protection of sensitive data and intellectual property. To this end, the authors propose the idea of "Trustless Audits Without Revealing Data or Models", which would allow for thorough auditing without exposing these sensitive elements.

Overall, the paper makes a strong case for the necessity of going beyond black-box access in order to enable rigorous AI audits and evaluations, ultimately supporting the development of more responsible and trustworthy AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important points about the limitations of black-box access and the need for greater transparency and interpretability in AI systems. The authors rightly highlight the challenges posed by adversarial attacks and the importance of understanding the underlying decision-making processes of AI models.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the practical implementation details of the proposed solutions, such as the "trustless audits" concept. While the high-level ideas are compelling, more research would be needed to understand the feasibility and potential trade-offs of such approaches.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the challenges and potential barriers to implementing the recommended solutions, such as the technical and legal complexities involved in establishing standardized auditing frameworks, or the resistance that AI companies may have to granting white-box access to their models.

Despite these minor caveats, the paper makes a compelling case for the necessity of going beyond black-box access in AI auditing and evaluation. The authors' emphasis on interpretability, explainability, and standardized auditing procedures is an important contribution to the ongoing discussion around responsible AI development and deployment.

Conclusion

This paper argues that black-box access to AI systems is insufficient for rigorous auditing and evaluation, and that additional transparency and explainability measures are necessary. The authors highlight the limitations of black-box access, particularly in the context of defending against adversarial attacks, and propose several solutions to address these challenges.

The key takeaways from this paper are the critical importance of white-box access and interpretability for AI auditing, the need for standardized auditing frameworks, and the potential of approaches like "trustless audits" and advanced interpretability techniques to balance transparency and intellectual property concerns.

As AI systems become more prevalent and influential in our lives, the issues raised in this paper will only become more pressing. Addressing the limitations of black-box access and developing comprehensive auditing standards will be crucial for ensuring the responsible development and deployment of AI technology.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

The Necessity of AI Audit Standards Boards

The Necessity of AI Audit Standards Boards

David Manheim, Sammy Martin, Mark Bailey, Mikhail Samin, Ross Greutzmacher

YC

0

Reddit

0

Auditing of AI systems is a promising way to understand and manage ethical problems and societal risks associated with contemporary AI systems, as well as some anticipated future risks. Efforts to develop standards for auditing Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have therefore understandably gained momentum. However, we argue that creating auditing standards is not just insufficient, but actively harmful by proliferating unheeded and inconsistent standards, especially in light of the rapid evolution and ethical and safety challenges of AI. Instead, the paper proposes the establishment of an AI Audit Standards Board, responsible for developing and updating auditing methods and standards in line with the evolving nature of AI technologies. Such a body would ensure that auditing practices remain relevant, robust, and responsive to the rapid advancements in AI. The paper argues that such a governance structure would also be helpful for maintaining public trust in AI and for promoting a culture of safety and ethical responsibility within the AI industry. Throughout the paper, we draw parallels with other industries, including safety-critical industries like aviation and nuclear energy, as well as more prosaic ones such as financial accounting and pharmaceuticals. AI auditing should emulate those fields, and extend beyond technical assessments to include ethical considerations and stakeholder engagement, but we explain that this is not enough; emulating other fields' governance mechanisms for these processes, and for audit standards creation, is a necessity. We also emphasize the importance of auditing the entire development process of AI systems, not just the final products...

Read more

4/23/2024

From Attack to Defense: Insights into Deep Learning Security Measures in Black-Box Settings

From Attack to Defense: Insights into Deep Learning Security Measures in Black-Box Settings

Firuz Juraev, Mohammed Abuhamad, Eric Chan-Tin, George K. Thiruvathukal, Tamer Abuhmed

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deep Learning (DL) is rapidly maturing to the point that it can be used in safety- and security-crucial applications. However, adversarial samples, which are undetectable to the human eye, pose a serious threat that can cause the model to misbehave and compromise the performance of such applications. Addressing the robustness of DL models has become crucial to understanding and defending against adversarial attacks. In this study, we perform comprehensive experiments to examine the effect of adversarial attacks and defenses on various model architectures across well-known datasets. Our research focuses on black-box attacks such as SimBA, HopSkipJump, MGAAttack, and boundary attacks, as well as preprocessor-based defensive mechanisms, including bits squeezing, median smoothing, and JPEG filter. Experimenting with various models, our results demonstrate that the level of noise needed for the attack increases as the number of layers increases. Moreover, the attack success rate decreases as the number of layers increases. This indicates that model complexity and robustness have a significant relationship. Investigating the diversity and robustness relationship, our experiments with diverse models show that having a large number of parameters does not imply higher robustness. Our experiments extend to show the effects of the training dataset on model robustness. Using various datasets such as ImageNet-1000, CIFAR-100, and CIFAR-10 are used to evaluate the black-box attacks. Considering the multiple dimensions of our analysis, e.g., model complexity and training dataset, we examined the behavior of black-box attacks when models apply defenses. Our results show that applying defense strategies can significantly reduce attack effectiveness. This research provides in-depth analysis and insight into the robustness of DL models against various attacks, and defenses.

Read more

5/6/2024

Trustless Audits without Revealing Data or Models

Trustless Audits without Revealing Data or Models

Suppakit Waiwitlikhit, Ion Stoica, Yi Sun, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Daniel Kang

YC

0

Reddit

0

There is an increasing conflict between business incentives to hide models and data as trade secrets, and the societal need for algorithmic transparency. For example, a rightsholder wishing to know whether their copyrighted works have been used during training must convince the model provider to allow a third party to audit the model and data. Finding a mutually agreeable third party is difficult, and the associated costs often make this approach impractical. In this work, we show that it is possible to simultaneously allow model providers to keep their model weights (but not architecture) and data secret while allowing other parties to trustlessly audit model and data properties. We do this by designing a protocol called ZkAudit in which model providers publish cryptographic commitments of datasets and model weights, alongside a zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) certifying that published commitments are derived from training the model. Model providers can then respond to audit requests by privately computing any function F of the dataset (or model) and releasing the output of F alongside another ZKP certifying the correct execution of F. To enable ZkAudit, we develop new methods of computing ZKPs for SGD on modern neural nets for simple recommender systems and image classification models capable of high accuracies on ImageNet. Empirically, we show it is possible to provide trustless audits of DNNs, including copyright, censorship, and counterfactual audits with little to no loss in accuracy.

Read more

4/9/2024

🗣️

Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations

Martina Cinquini, Riccardo Guidotti

YC

0

Reddit

0

A main drawback of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches is the feature independence assumption, hindering the study of potential variable dependencies. This leads to approximating black box behaviors by analyzing the effects on randomly generated feature values that may rarely occur in the original samples. This paper addresses this issue by integrating causal knowledge in an XAI method to enhance transparency and enable users to assess the quality of the generated explanations. Specifically, we propose a novel extension to a widely used local and model-agnostic explainer, which encodes explicit causal relationships within the data surrounding the instance being explained. Extensive experiments show that our approach overcomes the original method in terms of faithfully replicating the black-box model's mechanism and the consistency and reliability of the generated explanations.

Read more

4/16/2024