Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a critical component for machine learning (ML) applications, especially for large language models (LLMs) which can make incorrect predictions or "hallucinate" claims.
- This paper introduces a novel benchmark that provides a framework for evaluating UQ techniques for text generation tasks with LLMs.
- The benchmark includes state-of-the-art UQ baselines and supports assessment of confidence normalization methods to provide interpretable uncertainty scores.
- The paper presents a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across multiple text generation tasks to identify the most promising approaches.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models, including powerful large language models, can sometimes make mistakes or generate nonsensical output. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a way to measure how confident a model is in its predictions. This is important for building safe and reliable AI systems.
This research introduces a new benchmark that allows researchers to test different UQ techniques for language models. The benchmark includes a variety of standard UQ methods and helps evaluate how well they work across different text generation tasks.
The researchers used this benchmark to conduct a large study, looking at many UQ and normalization techniques. They wanted to identify the most effective approaches for providing clear, interpretable measures of uncertainty from language models. This can help developers build more robust and trustworthy AI systems, especially for long-form text generation and fact-checking.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a benchmark framework for evaluating uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques for text generation tasks using large language models (LLMs). The benchmark includes a collection of state-of-the-art UQ baselines, such as Monte Carlo dropout and ensembling, and supports the assessment of confidence normalization methods.
The key components of the benchmark are:
- Task Suite: The benchmark covers a diverse set of nine text generation tasks, including summarization, translation, and open-ended story generation.
- UQ Baselines: The benchmark provides implementations of various UQ techniques, including sampling-based methods like Monte Carlo dropout, as well as post-hoc calibration approaches.
- Evaluation Metrics: The benchmark defines a set of metrics to assess the quality of UQ, such as calibration, sharpness, and discriminative power.
Using this benchmark, the researchers conducted a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across the task suite. They analyzed the performance of different UQ methods in terms of their ability to provide well-calibrated and interpretable uncertainty scores.
The findings from this study shed light on the most promising UQ approaches for LLMs, providing guidance for developers and researchers working on building safe and reliable AI systems for text generation tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques in the context of large language models (LLMs). This is an important step forward, as prior research on UQ for LLMs has been fragmented, with disparate evaluation methods.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is the focus on text generation tasks, which may not fully capture the diversity of applications where LLMs are used. Extending the benchmark to include other types of tasks, such as question answering or classification, could further strengthen its utility.
Additionally, while the paper provides a thorough empirical investigation, it would be valuable to see more in-depth analysis of the underlying reasons for the observed performance differences between UQ techniques. Exploring the specific strengths and weaknesses of different approaches could help guide future research and development.
Overall, this paper represents a significant step forward in the quest for reliable and trustworthy large language models. By providing a standardized framework for UQ evaluation, it lays the groundwork for more robust and transparent AI systems, which is crucial as these models become increasingly prevalent in real-world applications.
Conclusion
This research introduces a novel benchmark for evaluating uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques in the context of large language models (LLMs). The benchmark provides a comprehensive and consistent environment for assessing the performance of various UQ methods across a diverse set of text generation tasks.
The large-scale empirical investigation conducted using this benchmark sheds light on the most promising UQ and normalization approaches for LLMs. These findings can inform the development of safer and more reliable AI systems that can better quantify and communicate the uncertainty in their predictions, a critical aspect for real-world deployment.
As large language models continue to advance and become more widely adopted, the availability of robust UQ evaluation frameworks like the one presented in this paper will be crucial for ensuring these powerful AI systems are used responsibly and with appropriate safeguards in place.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph
Roman Vashurin, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Artem Vazhentsev, Akim Tsvigun, Daniil Vasilev, Rui Xing, Abdelrahman Boda Sadallah, Lyudmila Rvanova, Sergey Petrakov, Alexander Panchenko, Timothy Baldwin, Preslav Nakov, Maxim Panov, Artem Shelmanov
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is becoming increasingly recognized as a critical component of applications that rely on machine learning (ML). The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has stimulated researchers to seek efficient and effective approaches to UQ in text generation tasks, as in addition to their emerging capabilities, these models have introduced new challenges for building safe applications. As with other ML models, LLMs are prone to make incorrect predictions, ``hallucinate'' by fabricating claims, or simply generate low-quality output for a given input. UQ is a key element in dealing with these challenges. However research to date on UQ methods for LLMs has been fragmented, with disparate evaluation methods. In this work, we tackle this issue by introducing a novel benchmark that implements a collection of state-of-the-art UQ baselines, and provides an environment for controllable and consistent evaluation of novel techniques by researchers in various text generation tasks. Our benchmark also supports the assessment of confidence normalization methods in terms of their ability to provide interpretable scores. Using our benchmark, we conduct a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across nine tasks and shed light on the most promising approaches.
Read more6/26/2024
💬
0
Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models
Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng Sun
Large language models (LLMs) specializing in natural language generation (NLG) have recently started exhibiting promising capabilities across a variety of domains. However, gauging the trustworthiness of responses generated by LLMs remains an open challenge, with limited research on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for NLG. Furthermore, existing literature typically assumes white-box access to language models, which is becoming unrealistic either due to the closed-source nature of the latest LLMs or computational constraints. In this work, we investigate UQ in NLG for *black-box* LLMs. We first differentiate *uncertainty* vs *confidence*: the former refers to the ``dispersion'' of the potential predictions for a fixed input, and the latter refers to the confidence on a particular prediction/generation. We then propose and compare several confidence/uncertainty measures, applying them to *selective NLG* where unreliable results could either be ignored or yielded for further assessment. Experiments were carried out with several popular LLMs on question-answering datasets (for evaluation purposes). Results reveal that a simple measure for the semantic dispersion can be a reliable predictor of the quality of LLM responses, providing valuable insights for practitioners on uncertainty management when adopting LLMs. The code to replicate our experiments is available at https://github.com/zlin7/UQ-NLG.
Read more5/21/2024
0
Benchmarking LLMs via Uncertainty Quantification
Fanghua Ye, Mingming Yang, Jianhui Pang, Longyue Wang, Derek F. Wong, Emine Yilmaz, Shuming Shi, Zhaopeng Tu
The proliferation of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) from various institutions has highlighted the urgent need for comprehensive evaluation methods. However, current evaluation platforms, such as the widely recognized HuggingFace open LLM leaderboard, neglect a crucial aspect -- uncertainty, which is vital for thoroughly assessing LLMs. To bridge this gap, we introduce a new benchmarking approach for LLMs that integrates uncertainty quantification. Our examination involves eight LLMs (LLM series) spanning five representative natural language processing tasks. Our findings reveal that: I) LLMs with higher accuracy may exhibit lower certainty; II) Larger-scale LLMs may display greater uncertainty compared to their smaller counterparts; and III) Instruction-finetuning tends to increase the uncertainty of LLMs. These results underscore the significance of incorporating uncertainty in the evaluation of LLMs.
Read more4/26/2024
🔍
0
LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs
Caiqi Zhang, Fangyu Liu, Marco Basaldella, Nigel Collier
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability in a variety of NLP tasks. However, LLMs are also prone to generate nonfactual content. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is pivotal in enhancing our understanding of a model's confidence on its generation, thereby aiding in the mitigation of nonfactual outputs. Existing research on UQ predominantly targets short text generation, typically yielding brief, word-limited responses. However, real-world applications frequently necessitate much longer responses. Our study first highlights the limitations of current UQ methods in handling long text generation. We then introduce textsc{Luq} and its two variations, a series of novel sampling-based UQ approaches specifically designed for long text. Our findings reveal that textsc{Luq} outperforms existing baseline methods in correlating with the model's factuality scores (negative coefficient of -0.85 observed for Gemini Pro). To further improve the factuality of LLM responses, we propose textsc{Luq-Ensemble}, a method that ensembles responses from multiple models and selects the response with the lowest uncertainty. The ensembling method greatly improves the response factuality upon the best standalone LLM.
Read more7/12/2024