Benchmarking the Fairness of Image Upsampling Methods

2401.13555

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/1/2024 by Mike Laszkiewicz, Imant Daunhawer, Julia E. Vogt, Asja Fischer, Johannes Lederer
Benchmarking the Fairness of Image Upsampling Methods

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a rapid development of deep generative models for creating synthetic media, such as images and videos. While the practical applications of these models in everyday tasks are enticing, it is crucial to assess the inherent risks regarding their fairness. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive framework for benchmarking the performance and fairness of conditional generative models. We develop a set of metrics$unicode{x2013}$inspired by their supervised fairness counterparts$unicode{x2013}$to evaluate the models on their fairness and diversity. Focusing on the specific application of image upsampling, we create a benchmark covering a wide variety of modern upsampling methods. As part of the benchmark, we introduce UnfairFace, a subset of FairFace that replicates the racial distribution of common large-scale face datasets. Our empirical study highlights the importance of using an unbiased training set and reveals variations in how the algorithms respond to dataset imbalances. Alarmingly, we find that none of the considered methods produces statistically fair and diverse results. All experiments can be reproduced using our provided repository.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the fairness of different image upsampling methods, which are used to increase the resolution of low-quality images.
  • The authors propose a benchmark to assess the fairness of these upsampling techniques and apply it to several state-of-the-art methods.
  • They find that while these techniques generally improve image quality, they can also introduce biases that disproportionately affect certain demographic groups.
  • The paper provides insights into the fairness challenges in image upsampling and suggests directions for developing more equitable algorithms.

Plain English Explanation

Image upsampling is a technique used to improve the quality of low-resolution images by increasing their resolution and sharpness. This can be helpful for various applications, such as enhancing the quality of digital photos or improving the appearance of images on high-resolution displays.

However, the authors of this paper found that some image upsampling methods can introduce biases that disproportionately affect certain demographic groups. For example, an upsampling algorithm might do a better job of enhancing the quality of images of people with certain skin tones or facial features compared to others.

To address this issue, the researchers developed a benchmark to assess the fairness of different image upsampling techniques. They applied this benchmark to several state-of-the-art upsampling methods and found that while these techniques generally improve image quality, they can also introduce unfair biases.

The paper's findings highlight the importance of considering fairness when developing image processing algorithms. By understanding the potential biases in these systems, researchers and developers can work towards creating more equitable and inclusive technologies that benefit all users, regardless of their demographic characteristics.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a benchmark to assess the fairness of image upsampling methods, which are used to increase the resolution and quality of low-resolution images. The authors apply this benchmark to several state-of-the-art upsampling techniques, including RCAN, ESPCN, and ESRGAN.

The benchmark is designed to measure the fairness of these upsampling methods across different demographic groups, such as individuals with different skin tones or facial features. The authors use a dataset of diverse facial images and apply the upsampling techniques to generate high-resolution versions. They then evaluate the quality of the upsampled images using both objective metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM) and subjective assessments by human raters.

The results show that while the upsampling methods generally improve image quality, they can also introduce biases that disproportionately benefit certain demographic groups. For example, the authors find that ESRGAN performs better on images of individuals with lighter skin tones compared to those with darker skin tones.

The paper provides insights into the fairness challenges in image upsampling and suggests several directions for future research, such as developing upsampling algorithms that are more equitable across different demographic groups. The authors also discuss the importance of considering fairness when designing and deploying image processing technologies, as these systems can have significant impacts on individuals and communities.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important concerns about the fairness of image upsampling methods and provides a valuable benchmark for assessing these issues. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations of their study, such as the relatively small size of the dataset used and the potential for subjective biases in the human evaluation of the upsampled images.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying causes of the observed biases, which could be related to factors such as the composition of the training data, the architecture of the upsampling models, or the specific algorithms used. Further research is needed to better understand the sources of these biases and develop more robust solutions.

It is also worth noting that the fairness challenges identified in this paper are not unique to image upsampling and are a broader concern in the field of computer vision and machine learning. The authors of this paper have made important contributions to the broader discussion around algorithmic fairness, and their work could provide valuable insights for researchers and developers working on a range of visual computing applications.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the importance of considering fairness when developing image upsampling techniques, as these algorithms can introduce biases that disproportionately affect certain demographic groups. The authors' proposed benchmark provides a valuable tool for assessing the fairness of these methods, and their findings suggest that more work is needed to create equitable and inclusive image processing technologies.

By addressing these fairness challenges, researchers and developers can work towards creating image upsampling systems that benefit all users, regardless of their individual characteristics. This could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from digital photography to medical imaging and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

πŸ›Έ

Distribution-aware Fairness Test Generation

Sai Sathiesh Rajan, Ezekiel Soremekun, Yves Le Traon, Sudipta Chattopadhyay

YC

0

Reddit

0

Ensuring that all classes of objects are detected with equal accuracy is essential in AI systems. For instance, being unable to identify any one class of objects could have fatal consequences in autonomous driving systems. Hence, ensuring the reliability of image recognition systems is crucial. This work addresses how to validate group fairness in image recognition software. We propose a distribution-aware fairness testing approach (called DistroFair) that systematically exposes class-level fairness violations in image classifiers via a synergistic combination of out-of-distribution (OOD) testing and semantic-preserving image mutation. DistroFair automatically learns the distribution (e.g., number/orientation) of objects in a set of images. Then it systematically mutates objects in the images to become OOD using three semantic-preserving image mutations - object deletion, object insertion and object rotation. We evaluate DistroFair using two well-known datasets (CityScapes and MS-COCO) and three major, commercial image recognition software (namely, Amazon Rekognition, Google Cloud Vision and Azure Computer Vision). Results show that about 21% of images generated by DistroFair reveal class-level fairness violations using either ground truth or metamorphic oracles. DistroFair is up to 2.3x more effective than two main baselines, i.e., (a) an approach which focuses on generating images only within the distribution (ID) and (b) fairness analysis using only the original image dataset. We further observed that DistroFair is efficient, it generates 460 images per hour, on average. Finally, we evaluate the semantic validity of our approach via a user study with 81 participants, using 30 real images and 30 corresponding mutated images generated by DistroFair. We found that images generated by DistroFair are 80% as realistic as real-world images.

Read more

5/15/2024

Sampling Strategies for Mitigating Bias in Face Synthesis Methods

Sampling Strategies for Mitigating Bias in Face Synthesis Methods

Emmanouil Maragkoudakis, Symeon Papadopoulos, Iraklis Varlamis, Christos Diou

YC

0

Reddit

0

Synthetically generated images can be used to create media content or to complement datasets for training image analysis models. Several methods have recently been proposed for the synthesis of high-fidelity face images; however, the potential biases introduced by such methods have not been sufficiently addressed. This paper examines the bias introduced by the widely popular StyleGAN2 generative model trained on the Flickr Faces HQ dataset and proposes two sampling strategies to balance the representation of selected attributes in the generated face images. We focus on two protected attributes, gender and age, and reveal that biases arise in the distribution of randomly sampled images against very young and very old age groups, as well as against female faces. These biases are also assessed for different image quality levels based on the GIQA score. To mitigate bias, we propose two alternative methods for sampling on selected lines or spheres of the latent space to increase the number of generated samples from the under-represented classes. The experimental results show a decrease in bias against underrepresented groups and a more uniform distribution of the protected features at different levels of image quality.

Read more

5/21/2024

πŸ“ˆ

Metrizing Fairness

Yves Rychener, Bahar Taskesen, Daniel Kuhn

YC

0

Reddit

0

We study supervised learning problems that have significant effects on individuals from two demographic groups, and we seek predictors that are fair with respect to a group fairness criterion such as statistical parity (SP). A predictor is SP-fair if the distributions of predictions within the two groups are close in Kolmogorov distance, and fairness is achieved by penalizing the dissimilarity of these two distributions in the objective function of the learning problem. In this paper, we identify conditions under which hard SP constraints are guaranteed to improve predictive accuracy. We also showcase conceptual and computational benefits of measuring unfairness with integral probability metrics (IPMs) other than the Kolmogorov distance. Conceptually, we show that the generator of any IPM can be interpreted as a family of utility functions and that unfairness with respect to this IPM arises if individuals in the two demographic groups have diverging expected utilities. We also prove that the unfairness-regularized prediction loss admits unbiased gradient estimators, which are constructed from random mini-batches of training samples, if unfairness is measured by the squared $mathcal L^2$-distance or by a squared maximum mean discrepancy. In this case, the fair learning problem is susceptible to efficient stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real data show that these SGD algorithms outperform state-of-the-art methods for fair learning in that they achieve superior accuracy-unfairness trade-offs -- sometimes orders of magnitude faster.

Read more

6/12/2024

⛏️

Formal Specification, Assessment, and Enforcement of Fairness for Generative AIs

Chih-Hong Cheng, Changshun Wu, Harald Ruess, Xingyu Zhao, Saddek Bensalem

YC

0

Reddit

0

Reinforcing or even exacerbating societal biases and inequalities will increase significantly as generative AI increasingly produces useful artifacts, from text to images and beyond, for the real world. We address these issues by formally characterizing the notion of fairness for generative AI as a basis for monitoring and enforcing fairness. We define two levels of fairness using the notion of infinite sequences of abstractions of AI-generated artifacts such as text or images. The first is the fairness demonstrated on the generated sequences, which is evaluated only on the outputs while agnostic to the prompts and models used. The second is the inherent fairness of the generative AI model, which requires that fairness be manifested when input prompts are neutral, that is, they do not explicitly instruct the generative AI to produce a particular type of output. We also study relative intersectional fairness to counteract the combinatorial explosion of fairness when considering multiple categories together with lazy fairness enforcement. Finally, fairness monitoring and enforcement are tested against some current generative AI models.

Read more

5/7/2024